Criteria |
Excellent (9-10 points) |
Average (8-9 points) |
Fair (6-7 points) |
Poor (0-5 points) |
Eugenics Background |
Thoroughly defines eugenics and provides a detailed explanation of its historical context. |
Defines eugenics and explains its historical context with some depth. |
Defines eugenics but lacks depth in explaining its historical context. |
Definition of eugenics is unclear or inaccurate. |
Potential Benefits |
Provides a comprehensive analysis of the practical and positive implications of the chosen aspect of eugenics, supported by evidence. |
Discusses the potential benefits of the chosen aspect of eugenics with some evidence. |
Touches on the potential benefits but lacks depth or evidence. |
Does not address potential benefits or provides inaccurate information. |
Ethical Concerns |
Thoroughly explores the negative applications and ethical concerns related to the chosen aspect of eugenics, considering various ethical dilemmas and implications. |
Discusses ethical concerns and potential misuse of technologies with some depth. |
Touches on ethical concerns but lacks depth or overlooks key issues. |
Does not address ethical concerns or provides inaccurate information. |
Biblical Perspective |
Incorporates a detailed analysis of relevant scriptures, theological principles, and moral teachings, providing insightful reflections on the ethical implications of eugenics from a biblical standpoint. |
Includes a biblical perspective with some analysis of scriptures and theological principles. |
Touches on the biblical perspective but lacks depth in analysis or reflection. |
Minimal or no incorporation of a biblical perspective. |
Structure |
Essay is well-structured, coherent, and logically organized with a clear thesis statement, developed arguments, and insightful reflections. |
Essay is mostly well-structured with a clear thesis statement and developed arguments. |
Structure is somewhat disorganized, lacking a clear thesis or coherent development of arguments. |
Essay lacks structure, coherence, and a clear thesis statement. |
Mechanics |
Essay demonstrates strong writing mechanics, including grammar, punctuation, and spelling. |
Writing mechanics are mostly accurate with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, or spelling. |
Contains noticeable errors in writing mechanics that may distract from the content. |
Significant errors in writing mechanics that impede understanding. |
MLA Formatting |
Adheres to MLA formatting guidelines consistently throughout the essay, including proper citations and a works cited page. |
Mostly follows MLA formatting guidelines but may have minor inconsistencies in citations or formatting. |
Attempts to use MLA formatting but lacks consistency or accuracy in citations and formatting. |
Does not adhere to MLA formatting guidelines. |