| Criteria | 10 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intro/Conclusion/Thesis | Clear, engaging introduction and conclusion with a strong thesis statement that previews main points. | Introduction and conclusion are present with a thesis statement, but may lack depth or clarity. | Basic introduction and conclusion with a vague thesis statement. | Introduction or conclusion is missing or unclear, and thesis is weak or absent. | Significant issues with introduction, conclusion, and thesis statement. | No introduction, conclusion, or thesis statement. |
| Topic Sentences and Transitions | Effective topic sentences that connect to the thesis and smooth transitions between paragraphs. | Most topic sentences relate to the thesis, and transitions are generally smooth. | Some topic sentences are weakly connected to the thesis, and transitions could be improved. | Weak topic sentences and abrupt transitions between paragraphs. | Topic sentences are unclear or irrelevant, and transitions are missing or confusing. | Lack of topic sentences and transitions. |
| Evidence | Thorough and relevant textual evidence that supports analysis and arguments effectively. | Most evidence is relevant, but some may be lacking in depth or connection to analysis. | Some evidence is present but may not fully support analysis or arguments. | Minimal evidence provided, and its relevance to analysis is unclear. | Little to no evidence included, and its connection to analysis is weak or nonexistent. | No textual evidence included. |
| Commentary/Analysis | Insightful and thorough analysis that demonstrates a deep understanding of the text and its themes. | Analysis is mostly clear and demonstrates understanding of the text, but lacks depth in some areas. | Basic analysis that addresses the prompt but lacks depth or insight. | Analysis is superficial and lacks clear connection to the text or prompt. | Analysis is minimal or irrelevant to the text and prompt. | No analysis provided. |
| Style/Vocab/Sentence Structure | Sophisticated writing style with varied vocabulary and strong sentence structure. | Writing style is generally strong, but vocabulary and sentence structure could be more varied. | Basic writing style with limited vocabulary and repetitive sentence structure. | Writing style is weak, and vocabulary/sentence structure hinder clarity and coherence. | Poor writing style, limited vocabulary, and confusing sentence structure. | Significant issues with style, vocabulary, and sentence structure. |
| Mechanics and Coherence | Almost flawless mechanics (grammar, punctuation, spelling) and strong coherence throughout the essay. | Minor errors in mechanics and coherence, but overall well-written and coherent. | Some noticeable errors in mechanics and coherence that affect readability. | Multiple errors in mechanics and coherence that hinder understanding. | Significant issues with mechanics and coherence that impede comprehension. | Extensive errors in mechanics and coherence throughout. |
| MLA Format | Correct MLA format including in-text citations, Works Cited page, and overall adherence to formatting guidelines. | Most elements of MLA format are present but may contain minor errors or inconsistencies. | Some attempts at MLA format, but significant errors or omissions are present. | Minimal adherence to MLA format requirements with major errors or missing components. | Lack of MLA format and numerous errors in citation and formatting. | No attempt at MLA format. |