| Criteria | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intro/Conclusion | Missing or unclear introduction and conclusion | Introduction or conclusion lacks focus | Introduction and conclusion are present but lack depth | Introduction and conclusion are present and somewhat effective | Strong introduction and conclusion that effectively frame the essay |
| Topic Sentences and Transitions | Missing or unclear topic sentences and transitions | Topic sentences and transitions are present but ineffective | Topic sentences and transitions are somewhat effective | Topic sentences and transitions are clear and mostly effective | Strong topic sentences and transitions that effectively guide the reader |
| Evidence | Lack of relevant or sufficient evidence | Minimal or weak use of evidence | Some relevant evidence used but lacks depth | Uses relevant evidence to support analysis | Thorough and compelling use of evidence to support analysis |
| Commentary/Analysis | Little to no analysis provided | Analysis is superficial or unclear | Analysis is present but lacks depth | Analysis is clear and mostly insightful | Analysis is thorough, insightful, and demonstrates a deep understanding |
| Style, Vocabulary, Sentence Structure | Poor style, limited vocabulary, and weak sentence structure | Style, vocabulary, and sentence structure need improvement | Some variation in style and vocabulary, but lacks consistency | Effective style, varied vocabulary, and mostly strong sentence structure | Strong, engaging style, sophisticated vocabulary, and excellent sentence structure |
| Mechanics and Coherence | Many errors in mechanics and lack of coherence | Several errors in mechanics and coherence is weak | Some errors in mechanics and coherence is inconsistent | Few errors in mechanics and mostly coherent | Excellent mechanics and high level of coherence |