Here is the HTML table for the evaluation rubric:
“`html
| Criteria / Topics | Scoring Scale | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ideas and Content | -1/2 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| Support: explanations, quotations, and five or more sentences | -1/2 | ||||||
| Accuracy: content, quotations (capitalization), and titles | -1/2 | ||||||
| Originality: plagiarism from internet; plagiarism from other students | -1/2 | ||||||
| Paraphrasing: ineffective paraphrasing and quoting instead of paraphrasing | -1/2 | ||||||
| Focus: relevance and sequence | -1/2 | ||||||
| Integration: awkward, not embedded, ends of sentences | -1/2 | ||||||
| Sources: full introduction on first reference | -1/2 | ||||||
| Organization and Structure | -1 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| Introduction: introduction and bridge | -1 | ||||||
| Thesis: missing, weak, not at end | -1/2 | ||||||
| Body: topic sentences: missing, weak | -1/2 | ||||||
| Paragraphing: illogical organization or missing point | -1 | ||||||
| Transitions: topic sentences, paragraphs | -1 | ||||||
| Conclusions: missing, weak, transitional | -1/2 | ||||||
| Conclusion | -1 | ||||||
| Voice | -1 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Formal tone (no contractions, no slang [ton]) | -1 | ||||||
| Person (no first or second person if possible) | -1 | ||||||
| Diction (word choice) | -1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Sophistication (do not use quote, a lot, lots, thing, big) | -1 | ||||||
| Sentence Fluency | -2/6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| No fragments, run-ons, comma splices | -2/6 | ||||||
| Correct coordinate conjunctions and connectives | -1 | ||||||
| Correct parallelism | -1 | ||||||
| No weak sentences (There is/are, is when/where/because) | -1 | ||||||
| Appropriate sentence variety (S., Cd., Cx., Cd.-Cx.) | -1 | ||||||
| No awkward sentences | -1 | ||||||
| Conventions | -1 | 7 | 8 | 9</
| |||