| Criteria | 1 (Below Standard) | 2 (Approaching Standard) | 3 (Meets Standard) | 4 (Exceeds Standard) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thesis | The thesis is unclear or missing. | The thesis is weak and lacks specificity. | The thesis is clear and presents a focused argument. | The thesis is strong, specific, and compelling. |
| Evidence and Commentary | Limited or irrelevant evidence with minimal commentary. | Some relevant evidence with basic commentary. | Strong evidence with insightful commentary that supports the argument. | Compelling evidence with sophisticated commentary that enhances the argument. |
| Sophistication | Writing lacks depth and complexity. | Some attempt at complexity but lacks consistency. | Shows depth and complexity in argument development. | Demonstrates exceptional depth and complexity in argumentation. |
| Language/Conventions | Significant errors in grammar, punctuation, and usage. | Some errors in grammar, punctuation, and usage. | Mostly correct grammar, punctuation, and language use. | Uses sophisticated language and conventions effectively. |
| Organization and Structure | Essay lacks coherence and structure. | Some attempt at organization but lacks consistency. | Well-organized with a clear structure that enhances the argument. | Exceptionally organized with a compelling structure that effectively supports the argument. |