“`html
| Criteria | 4 Points | 3 Points | 2 Points | 1 Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The answer is clear | The response is exceptionally clear and well-organized, demonstrating a thorough understanding of the author’s use of rhetoric. | The response is clear and organized, showing a good understanding of the author’s use of rhetoric. | The response is somewhat clear but lacks organization, showing a partial understanding of the author’s use of rhetoric. | The response is unclear and disorganized, showing little to no understanding of the author’s use of rhetoric. |
| The answer is fully supported by details | The response includes multiple specific examples from the text that strongly support the analysis of the author’s rhetorical strategies. | The response includes some specific examples from the text that support the analysis of the author’s rhetorical strategies. | The response includes few examples from the text, and they only somewhat support the analysis of the author’s rhetorical strategies. | The response includes no examples or irrelevant examples from the text, providing little to no support for the analysis. |
| There are few errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics | The response has no errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics, making it easy to read and understand. | The response has a few minor errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics, but they do not interfere with understanding. | The response has several errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that may interfere with understanding. | The response has numerous errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics, making it difficult to read and understand. |
“`