| Criteria / Topics | Scoring Scale | |
|---|---|---|
| Points | Descriptors | |
| Skillful selection and explanation of evidence and/or details | 25 | Student skillfully selects and explains evidence and/or details from both excerpts to support their argument. The evidence and/or details are relevant, accurate, and effectively integrated into the letter. |
| Skillful and/or subtle organization | 20 | Student skillfully organizes the letter in a logical and effective manner. The letter has a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. Transitions between ideas are smooth and enhance the overall flow of the letter. |
| Rich expression of ideas | 20 | Student demonstrates a rich expression of ideas throughout the letter. The language used is varied, precise, and engaging. The letter effectively conveys the student’s thoughts and arguments on the harmful effects of plastic waste and e-waste. |
| Full awareness of the task and mode | 15 | Student demonstrates a full awareness of the task and mode of writing. The letter effectively addresses the prompt by explaining the harmful effects of plastic waste and e-waste, as well as proposing immediate actions and their necessity. The tone and style of the letter are appropriate for addressing a congressperson. |
| Consistent control of a variety of sentence structures relative to length of essay | 10 | Student demonstrates consistent control of a variety of sentence structures throughout the letter. Sentences are varied in length and structure, enhancing the overall readability and effectiveness of the letter. |
| Consistent control of grammar, usage, and mechanics relative to complexity and/or length of essay | 10 | Student demonstrates consistent control of grammar, usage, and mechanics throughout the letter. There are minimal errors in sentence structure, punctuation, capitalization, spelling, and usage. The letter is polished and professional in its presentation. |