| Introduction |
Clearly introduces the task with all relevant details. Thoroughly explains the group’s focus and presentation method. |
Introduces the task and explains the group’s focus and presentation method with minor gaps. |
Adequately introduces the task but lacks detail in group focus and presentation. |
Incomplete introduction with minimal explanation of the task. |
No introduction provided. |
| Process |
Detailed explanation of planning and construction, including a clear role in the group and how Minecraft tools were used to reflect a civilisation. |
Good explanation of planning and role in the group with some mention of using Minecraft tools to reflect a civilisation. |
Basic explanation of planning, role, and use of tools, but lacks depth. |
Lacks clarity in explaining the process, role, or use of tools. |
No explanation of the process provided. |
| Challenges |
Insightfully identifies challenges and describes creative, effective solutions. |
Identifies challenges and describes how they were overcome with some effectiveness. |
Identifies challenges with basic solutions but lacks depth in reflection. |
Mentions challenges but provides little insight into overcoming them. |
No mention of challenges or solutions. |
| Teamwork |
Thoughtfully reflects on teamwork, highlighting contributions and how support was provided to others. |
Reflects on teamwork with a good explanation of contributions and support. |
Provides a basic reflection on teamwork, mentioning contributions but lacking detail. |
Reflection on teamwork is minimal with vague references to contributions. |
No reflection on teamwork provided. |
| Learning |
Clearly articulates new knowledge gained, with detailed connections to civilisation and skill improvement. |
Explains new knowledge and skills gained with some connection to the concept of civilisation. |
Mentions learning outcomes and skills gained, but lacks depth in connection to civilisation. |
Reflection on learning is shallow and lacks clarity. |
No reflection on learning provided. |
| Conclusion |
Strong conclusion that summarises the task outcome and offers meaningful insights on the importance of civilisation-building elements. |
Good conclusion that summarises the task outcome with some insights on civilisation-building elements. |
Conclusion summarises the task but lacks depth in insights. |
Conclusion is vague with minimal reflection on the task outcome. |
No conclusion provided. |
| Presentation (CANVA slides) |
Well-organised slides that clearly and effectively present the civilisation project with appropriate screenshots and visuals. |
Good slides with clear presentation of the civilisation project and relevant visuals. |
Adequate slides that present the project but lack visual clarity or organisation. |
Slides are disorganised and lack effective visuals or clear presentation. |
No CANVA slides presented. |
