Criteria |
5 Points |
4 Points |
3 Points |
2 Points |
1 Point |
Content Understanding |
Clearly identifies and explains the theme with detailed analysis and insight into the novel’s message. |
Identifies and explains the theme with good analysis and some insight into the novel’s message. |
Identifies the theme and connects it to the text, but analysis lacks depth. |
Theme is identified, but with minimal or unclear connection to the text. |
Theme is not identified or is incorrectly identified, with no connection to the text. |
Structure |
Follows a clear TEEL structure with a strong topic sentence, well-developed explanation, appropriate evidence, and a solid link back to the theme. |
Follows TEEL structure with minor issues in explanation or evidence, but maintains a clear progression. |
Logical progression is present, but some aspects of the TEEL structure are underdeveloped or unclear. |
Attempts TEEL structure but lacks clarity; several elements are missing or poorly connected. |
Lacks a clear structure; elements of TEEL are missing or poorly connected. |
Evidence and Explanation |
Provides well-chosen evidence directly tied to a thorough explanation of the theme. |
Provides relevant evidence with good explanation, but lacks thoroughness. |
Includes evidence, but it is not fully integrated into the explanation or analysis. |
Provides minimal evidence with weak explanation. |
Little to no evidence is provided, or the evidence is not relevant to the theme. |
Clarity and Expression |
Clear, concise, and grammatically correct writing with strong expression. |
Mostly clear and concise with minor grammatical errors or awkward phrasing. |
Generally clear, but with some awkward phrasing or minor grammatical errors. |
Writing is often unclear with several grammatical errors or awkward phrasing. |
Lacks clarity, with multiple grammatical errors or unclear phrasing that hinders understanding. |