Rubric – English Grade 8 Socratic Seminar Written Responses – The Hunger games

Criteria Scoring Scale and Points
Overall Development
  • 0-2 points: Response lacks clear development and coherence.
  • 3-5 points: Response shows some development but lacks consistency.
  • 6-8 points: Response is well-developed and coherent.
  • 9-10 points: Response is highly developed, coherent, and engaging.
Organization
  • 0-2 points: Response lacks clear organization.
  • 3-5 points: Response is somewhat organized but may lack consistency.
  • 6-8 points: Response is well-organized and structured.
  • 9-10 points: Response is highly organized, structured, and flows smoothly.
Support
  • 0-2 points: Response lacks sufficient support from the text.
  • 3-5 points: Response includes some support but may lack depth.
  • 6-8 points: Response is supported with relevant evidence from the text.
  • 9-10 points: Response is thoroughly supported with detailed evidence from the text.
Sentence Structure
  • 0-2 points: Response has frequent errors in sentence structure.
  • 3-5 points: Response includes varied sentence structures but may lack fluency.
  • 6-8 points: Response demonstrates effective sentence structure and fluency.
  • 9-10 points: Response showcases sophisticated sentence structures with exceptional fluency.
Word Choice
  • 0-2 points: Response lacks precise and varied word choice.
  • 3-5 points: Response includes some varied word choice but may lack precision.
  • 6-8 points: Response demonstrates precise and varied word choice.
  • 9-10 points: Response showcases exceptional word choice that enhances meaning.
Mechanics
  • 0-1 points: Response has numerous mechanical errors.
  • 2-3 points: Response includes some mechanical errors but may lack consistency.
  • 4 points: Response demonstrates consistent and accurate mechanics.
  • 5 points: Response is virtually error-free in terms of mechanics.
Use of Text Evidence
  • 0-1 points: Response lacks or incorrectly uses text evidence.
  • 2-3 points: Response includes some text evidence but may lack relevance or accuracy.
  • 4 points: Response effectively integrates relevant and accurate text evidence.
  • 5 points: Response masterfully incorporates text evidence to support arguments.
Print

Login your account

Please login your account to get started.

Don't have an account?

Register your account

Please sign up your account to get started.

Already have an account?