Criteria |
1 – Below Expectations |
2 – Approaching Expectations |
3 – Meeting Expectations |
4 – Exceeding Expectations |
Claim |
The claim is unclear or missing. |
The claim is somewhat clear but lacks specificity. |
The claim is clear and identifies an adjective that represents the character. |
The claim is clear, specific, and insightful. |
Introduction |
The introduction is missing or does not introduce the topic effectively. |
The introduction is weak and lacks engagement. |
The introduction provides background information and states the purpose of the essay. |
The introduction hooks the reader and clearly presents the topic. |
Evidence |
Little to no evidence is provided to support the claim. |
Some evidence is included but is not fully relevant or explained. |
Relevant evidence is provided to support the claim. |
Detailed and compelling evidence is effectively used to support the claim. |
In-Text Citations |
In-text citations are missing or incorrectly formatted. |
Some in-text citations are included but are not consistently formatted. |
In-text citations are included and correctly formatted. |
In-text citations are consistently included and properly formatted. |
Justification |
Justification for the claim is unclear or missing. |
Justification for the claim is somewhat explained but lacks depth. |
Justification for the claim is provided with some explanation. |
Justification for the claim is thorough, insightful, and well-supported. |
Conclusion |
The conclusion is missing or does not effectively wrap up the essay. |
The conclusion is weak and does not restate the main points. |
The conclusion restates the main points and provides a brief summary. |
The conclusion effectively summarizes the argument and leaves a lasting impression. |
Organization |
The essay lacks a clear organizational structure. |
The organization is somewhat confusing and disrupts the flow of the essay. |
The essay is organized with a logical progression of ideas. |
The essay is well-organized with a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. |
Conventions |
Multiple errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling are present throughout the essay. |
Some errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling are present in the essay. |
There are few errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling in the essay. |
The essay demonstrates strong command of grammar, punctuation, and spelling. |
Development |
The essay lacks development and is underdeveloped. |
Some ideas are underdeveloped and lack detail. |
Most ideas are developed with sufficient detail. |
All ideas are fully developed with rich detail and depth. |
Structure |
The essay lacks a clear structure and coherence. |
The structure is somewhat unclear and does not fully support the argument. |
The essay follows a clear structure that supports the argument. |
The essay is exceptionally well-structured, enhancing the argument’s impact. |