Criteria |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Claim |
Claim is missing or irrelevant. |
Claim is unclear or somewhat related to the topic. |
Claim is somewhat clear and relevant to the topic. |
Claim is clear and directly related to the topic. |
Claim is clear, specific, and strongly related to the topic. |
Claim is clear, specific, compelling, and directly related to the topic. |
Claim is clear, specific, compelling, and directly related to the topic, effectively guiding the essay. |
Introduction |
Introduction is missing or does not introduce the topic. |
Introduction is unclear or lacks a clear purpose. |
Introduction is somewhat clear and introduces the topic. |
Introduction is clear and sets up the essay. |
Introduction is clear, engaging, and effectively introduces the topic. |
Introduction is clear, engaging, and effectively sets up the essay. |
Introduction is clear, engaging, and effectively sets up the essay, capturing the reader’s attention. |
Evidence |
Little to no evidence provided to support the claim. |
Minimal evidence provided, but lacks depth or relevance. |
Some evidence provided, but may lack relevance or clarity. |
Evidence provided supports the claim with some relevance and clarity. |
Evidence provided supports the claim with relevance and clarity. |
Evidence provided strongly supports the claim with relevance and clarity. |
Evidence provided strongly supports the claim with relevance, clarity, and depth. |
In Text Citations |
No in-text citations included. |
One or two in-text citations included, but not properly formatted. |
Some in-text citations included, but inconsistently formatted. |
In-text citations included and mostly properly formatted. |
In-text citations included and properly formatted. |
In-text citations included, properly formatted, and enhance the credibility of the essay. |
In-text citations included, properly formatted, and effectively support the argument. |
Justification |
Justification is missing or unclear. |
Justification is weak or lacks depth. |
Justification is somewhat clear but lacks depth. |
Justification is clear and somewhat supports the claim. |
Justification is clear and supports the claim. |
Justification is clear, strong, and effectively supports the claim. |
Justification is clear, strong, detailed, and effectively supports the claim. |
Conclusion |
Conclusion is missing or does not effectively wrap up the essay. |
Conclusion is weak or lacks a clear summary. |
Conclusion is somewhat clear but lacks a strong summary. |
Conclusion is clear and provides a basic summary. |
Conclusion is clear and provides a summary that relates back to the claim. |
Conclusion is clear, provides a strong summary, and reinforces the claim. |
Conclusion is clear, provides a strong and insightful summary, and effectively reinforces the claim. |
Organization |
Essay lacks organization and coherence. |
Essay is somewhat disorganized and lacks coherence. |
Essay is somewhat organized but lacks smooth transitions. |
Essay is organized with some transitions between ideas. |
Essay is well-organized with clear transitions between ideas. |
Essay is well-organized with smooth transitions between ideas. |
Essay is well-organized with seamless transitions between ideas, enhancing overall coherence. |
Conventions |
Multiple errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. |
Several errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. |
Some errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. |
Few errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. |
Minor errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. |
Almost no errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. |
No errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. |
Development |
Essay lacks development and depth of ideas. |
Essay is underdeveloped and lacks depth in supporting ideas. |
Essay is somewhat developed but lacks depth in supporting ideas. |
Essay is adequately developed with some depth in supporting ideas. |
Essay is well-developed with depth in supporting ideas. |
Essay is well-developed with strong depth in supporting ideas. |
Essay is well-developed with thorough depth in supporting ideas, demonstrating a strong understanding of the topic. |