“`html
Scoring Scale | Points |
---|---|
30 | Exceptional |
27 | Distinguished |
24 | Excellent |
21 | Good |
18 | Acceptable |
15 | Basic answer |
12 | Inadequate |
9 | Poor |
7 | Feeble |
0 | Incompetent |
Criteria | Points |
Ability to develop an argument | |
Exceptional | Student presents a clear, insightful argument with strong supporting evidence that demonstrates a deep understanding of Odysseus’s character development. |
Distinguished | Student presents a well-developed argument with supporting evidence that demonstrates a good understanding of Odysseus’s character development. |
Excellent | Student presents a solid argument with adequate supporting evidence that demonstrates an understanding of Odysseus’s character development. |
Good | Student presents an argument with some supporting evidence that demonstrates a basic understanding of Odysseus’s character development. |
Acceptable | Student presents a basic argument with limited supporting evidence that demonstrates a minimal understanding of Odysseus’s character development. |
Basic answer | Student presents a vague argument with little to no supporting evidence that demonstrates a lack of understanding of Odysseus’s character development. |
Inadequate | Student’s argument lacks coherence and supporting evidence, making it difficult to understand Odysseus’s character development. |
Poor | Student’s argument is unclear and lacks supporting evidence, resulting in a weak understanding of Odysseus’s character development. |
Feeble | Student’s argument is disjointed and lacks any supporting evidence, showing a very limited understanding of Odysseus’s character development. |
Incompetent | Student does not present a coherent argument or any supporting evidence, demonstrating a complete lack of understanding of Odysseus’s character development. |
The argument is on topic | |
Exceptional | Student stays focused on the character development of Odysseus throughout the essay, with every point directly related to the topic. |
Distinguished | Student mostly stays focused on the character development of Odysseus, with minor deviations from the topic. |
Excellent | Student generally stays on topic, but some points are not directly related to the character development of Odysseus. |
Good | Student attempts to address the character development of Odysseus, but there are significant deviations from the topic. |
Acceptable | Student struggles to maintain focus on the character development of Odysseus, with many points unrelated to the topic. |
Basic answer | Student’s essay lacks a clear focus on the character development of Odysseus, with most points unrelated to the topic. |
Inadequate | Student’s essay is mostly off-topic, with only a few points related to the character development of Odysseus. |
Poor | Student’s essay is largely unrelated to the character development of Odysseus, with minimal connection to the topic. |
Feeble | Student’s essay is entirely off-topic and does not address the character development of Odysseus in any meaningful way. |
Incompetent | Student’s essay has no relevance to the character development of Odysseus, demonstrating a complete misunderstanding of the assignment. |
Quotations and/or evidence integrated | |
Exceptional | Student seamlessly integrates relevant quotations and evidence throughout the essay, effectively enhancing the argument. |
Distinguished | Student effectively incorporates quotations and evidence to support the argument, with minor issues in integration. |
Excellent | Student includes quotations and evidence to support the argument, but integration could be improved for better flow. |
Good | Student attempts to include quotations and evidence, but the integration is inconsistent and sometimes disrupts the argument. |
Acceptable | Student includes some quotations and evidence, but the integration is weak and does not effectively support the argument. |
Basic answer | Student includes minimal quotations and evidence, with little attempt at integration to support the argument. |
Inadequate | Student includes quotations and evidence sporadically, with little relevance to the argument and poor integration. |
Poor | Student includes quotations and evidence that are mostly irrelevant and disrupt the flow of the argument. |
Feeble | Student includes irrelevant quotations and evidence that do not support the argument, hindering the overall coherence of the essay. |
Incompetent | Student fails to include any relevant quotations or evidence to support the argument, showing a lack of understanding of how to integrate textual support. |
“`