| Prompt is restated and answered concisely. |
Prompt is clearly restated and fully answered in a concise manner. |
Prompt is mostly restated and answered with minor omissions. |
Prompt is somewhat restated and answered but lacks clarity. |
Prompt is minimally restated and answered with significant omissions. |
Prompt is not restated or answered. |
| Point of view is accurately stated. |
Point of view is accurately identified as first person. |
Point of view is mostly identified correctly with minor errors. |
Point of view is somewhat identified but with noticeable errors. |
Point of view is minimally identified and mostly incorrect. |
Point of view is not identified or incorrect. |
| Perspective is correctly identified. |
Perspective is correctly identified as the narrator’s. |
Perspective is mostly identified correctly with minor errors. |
Perspective is somewhat identified but with noticeable errors. |
Perspective is minimally identified and mostly incorrect. |
Perspective is not identified or incorrect. |
| Point of view is defined correctly. |
Point of view is thoroughly defined with clear understanding. |
Point of view is mostly defined correctly with minor errors. |
Point of view is somewhat defined but lacks clarity. |
Point of view is minimally defined and mostly unclear. |
Point of view is not defined or incorrect. |
| Brief summation of the story is given. |
Summation is concise and covers key elements of the story. |
Summation is mostly concise with minor omissions. |
Summation is somewhat concise but lacks key elements. |
Summation is minimally concise and lacks clarity. |
Summation is not provided or incorrect. |
| An accurate description of how first person narration plays out in the story is given. |
Accurate and detailed description of first person narration is provided. |
Mostly accurate description with minor errors. |
Somewhat accurate description but lacks detail. |
Minimal description and mostly inaccurate. |
No description or incorrect. |
| Evidence supports how the first person narration plays out in the story. |
Strong and relevant evidence is provided to support narration. |
Mostly relevant evidence with minor gaps. |
Somewhat relevant evidence but lacks strength. |
Minimal evidence and mostly irrelevant. |
No evidence or irrelevant. |
| Explanation is relevant and addresses how the evidence and topic sentence are related. |
Explanation is clear, relevant, and well-connected to evidence and topic. |
Mostly clear explanation with minor gaps in relevance. |
Somewhat clear explanation but lacks connection. |
Minimal explanation and mostly irrelevant. |
No explanation or irrelevant. |
| Conclusion is logical and addresses the overall impact of the point of view and perspective on the story. |
Conclusion is logical and thoroughly addresses the impact on the story. |
Mostly logical conclusion with minor gaps. |
Somewhat logical conclusion but lacks depth. |
Minimal conclusion and mostly illogical. |
No conclusion or illogical. |
