Criteria |
25 Points |
20 Points |
15 Points |
10 Points |
0 Points |
Introduction/Topic |
Exceptional introduction that grabs the interest of the reader and clearly states the topic. |
Proficient introduction that is interesting and clearly states the topic. |
Basic introduction that states the topic but lacks interest. |
Weak or no introduction of the topic. |
No introduction present. |
Thesis |
Thesis/topic is exceptionally clear, well-developed, and a definitive statement. |
Thesis/topic is clear and arguable statement of position. |
Thesis/topic is somewhat clear and arguable. |
Paper’s purpose is unclear. Thesis/topic is weak or missing. |
No thesis statement present. |
Credible Sources |
Paper is exceptionally researched, contains 7 sources total (including 3 peer-reviewed articles); the sources logically support the thesis argument. References are correctly cited. |
Paper is well-researched in detail and from 7 good sources (including 3 peer-reviewed articles). References are correctly cited. |
Information relates to the main topic, but few details and/or examples are given. Shows a limited variety of sources. References are not cited correctly. |
Information has little or nothing to do with the thesis. References are not cited correctly. |
No credible sources used or cited. |
Critical Analysis |
Exceptionally critical, relevant, and consistent connections made between evidence and thesis. Excellent analysis. |
Consistent connections are made between evidence and thesis. |
Some connections made between evidence and thesis. |
Limited or no connections made between evidence and thesis. |
No analysis present. |
Conclusion |
Excellent summary of thesis argument with concluding ideas that impact the reader. |
Good summary of topic with clear concluding ideas. |
Basic summary of topic with some final concluding ideas. |
Lack of summary of topic. |
No conclusion present. |
Writing |
Writing is clear and relevant, with no grammatical and/or spelling errors – polished and professional. References, citations, and images are properly formatted. |
Most ideas are stated clearly and are related to the topic, with only minor grammatical and/or spelling errors. References, citations, and images are adequate. |
Many ideas require clarification, are off-topic, or have little relevance to the assignment. Many grammatical and/or spelling errors; very challenging to read, poor writing flow. Improper references and/or citations section. |
Paper does not meet the criteria for the assignment (too short or incomplete, too long, and/or completely off-topic). Reference, citations, and images section is missing. |
No writing present. |