| Criteria | Poor (1 point) | Fair (2 points) | Good (3 points) | Very Good (4 points) | Outstanding (5 points) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content | The explanation lacks depth and does not provide clear reasons for the chosen leadership qualities. | The explanation provides some reasons for the chosen leadership qualities but lacks detail and clarity. | The explanation includes reasons for the chosen leadership qualities with some supporting details. | The explanation thoroughly discusses reasons for the chosen leadership qualities with clear and relevant supporting details. | The explanation is comprehensive, insightful, and provides compelling reasons for the chosen leadership qualities with strong supporting details. |
| Organization | The explanation is disorganized and difficult to follow. | The explanation has some organization but lacks a clear structure. | The explanation is mostly organized with a logical flow of ideas. | The explanation is well-organized with a clear structure that enhances understanding. | The explanation is exceptionally well-organized, with a seamless flow of ideas that enhances the overall presentation. |
| Presence | The presenter lacks confidence and struggles to engage the audience. | The presenter shows some confidence but struggles to maintain audience engagement. | The presenter demonstrates confidence and engages the audience to some extent. | The presenter is confident and effectively engages the audience throughout the presentation. | The presenter exudes confidence, captivates the audience, and maintains strong engagement throughout the presentation. |