| Criteria | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Topic Sentences | The response does not have a clear topic sentence. | The topic sentence is somewhat clear, but it could be more specific. | The topic sentence is clear and provides a good introduction to the response. | The topic sentence is clear, specific, and effectively introduces the response. |
| Textual Evidence | The response does not include any textual evidence to support ideas. | The response includes some textual evidence, but it is not well integrated or explained. | The response includes textual evidence that is relevant and supports ideas, but it could be more effectively integrated. | The response includes well-selected and well-integrated textual evidence that effectively supports ideas. |
| Summary | The response does not provide a clear summary of “Tuesday of the Other June”. | The summary is incomplete or contains inaccuracies. | The summary provides a basic understanding of the main events and characters in the story. | The summary provides a thorough and accurate understanding of the main events and characters in the story. |
| Analysis | The response does not include any analysis or interpretation of the text. | The analysis is limited or lacks depth. | The analysis demonstrates a basic understanding of the text and makes some connections. | The analysis demonstrates a thoughtful understanding of the text and makes insightful connections. |
| Conclusion Sentence | The response does not have a conclusion sentence. | The conclusion sentence is weak or does not effectively wrap up the response. | The conclusion sentence provides a basic summary of the response. | The conclusion sentence effectively summarizes the response and leaves the reader with a clear impression. |
| Grammar | The response has numerous grammatical errors that hinder understanding. | The response has some grammatical errors that occasionally hinder understanding. | The response has few grammatical errors that do not significantly hinder understanding. | The response has virtually no grammatical errors. |