Time travel is a fascinating concept, but it comes with its own set of mind-bending paradoxes. One of the most famous is the grandfather paradox. Imagine you travel back in time and accidentally prevent your grandfather from meeting your grandmother. If that happens, how could you have been born to travel back in time in the first place? This paradox highlights the complexities and potential contradictions of time travel.
Another intriguing time travel paradox is the bootstrap paradox. Picture this: you buy a copy of “Hamlet” and travel back to meet a young William Shakespeare, who hasn’t written the play yet. You give him the book, he publishes it, and centuries later, you buy a copy of “Hamlet” in a bookstore. So, who actually wrote the play? This paradox questions the origin of information and objects in time travel scenarios.
The Ship of Theseus paradox explores the nature of identity over time. Theseus, a mythical king, had a ship that was gradually repaired by replacing its old wooden parts with new ones. Eventually, none of the original parts remained. Is it still the same ship? And if someone reassembled the original parts into a ship, which one is the true Ship of Theseus? This paradox challenges our understanding of identity and change.
The Sorites paradox deals with the vagueness of language. Imagine a heap of sand. If you remove one grain, it’s still a heap. But if you keep removing grains, at what point does it stop being a heap? This paradox shows how language can be imprecise and how definitions can be subjective.
The liar paradox is a classic example of self-reference. Consider the statement, “This sentence is false.” If it’s true, then it must be false, but if it’s false, then it must be true. This paradox creates a loop of contradictions, challenging our understanding of truth and logic.
A playful version of the liar paradox is the Pinocchio paradox. Imagine Pinocchio saying, “My nose grows longer.” If he’s telling the truth, his nose should grow, but his nose only grows when he lies. This paradox adds a visual twist to the classic liar paradox.
The crocodile paradox involves a crocodile that promises to return a child if the mother correctly guesses whether he will return the child. If she guesses he won’t return the child and she’s right, the crocodile must return the child, contradicting her guess. This paradox highlights the complexity of promises and predictions.
The interesting number paradox suggests that all numbers are interesting. If you claim a number is uninteresting, that makes it interesting because it’s the first uninteresting number. This paradox plays with our perception of uniqueness and significance.
The Penrose triangle is a visual paradox that appears to be an impossible object. It’s a triangle that seems to defy the laws of geometry. Even when you understand the trick behind it, the triangle still looks impossible, challenging our perception of reality.
Hilbert’s paradox of the grand hotel illustrates the counter-intuitive nature of infinity. Imagine a hotel with an infinite number of rooms, all occupied. Surprisingly, the hotel can still accommodate new guests by shifting current guests to different rooms. This paradox demonstrates the strange properties of infinity and challenges our understanding of space and capacity.
Paradoxes like these stretch our minds and challenge our understanding of logic, identity, and reality. They remind us that not everything is as straightforward as it seems, and they encourage us to think critically and creatively.
Engage in a structured debate with your classmates about the implications of the grandfather paradox. Consider the logical, philosophical, and scientific perspectives. Discuss whether time travel could ever be possible without contradictions and explore potential solutions to the paradox.
Write a short story that involves a bootstrap paradox. Imagine a scenario where an object or piece of information exists without a clear origin. Share your story with the class and discuss the implications of such paradoxes on our understanding of causality and time.
In groups, create a physical or digital model of the Ship of Theseus. As you replace parts of the ship, discuss whether it remains the same ship. Consider identity and change, and debate which version of the ship is the “true” one. Present your findings to the class.
Design a game that illustrates the Sorites paradox. Use objects like grains of sand or blocks, and challenge players to determine when a collection stops being a “heap.” Reflect on how this paradox affects our understanding of language and definitions.
Create a 3D model or drawing of the Penrose triangle. Analyze why it appears impossible and discuss the optical illusions involved. Share your model with the class and explore how such visual paradoxes challenge our perception of reality.
Sure! Here’s a sanitized version of the transcript:
—
All of us know that if you ever travel back in time, you should definitely not harm your grandfather. I mean, that’s generally good advice, even for those of us who remain fixed to the linear timeline, but it’s especially good advice for those who don’t want to create some kind of temporal paradox in the space-time continuum. This problem, known as the grandfather paradox, presents the main issue of time travel. If you go back and prevent yourself from being born, how would you ever have been able to go back in time in the first place?
Other time travel paradoxes, such as the bootstrap paradox, take the question in a different direction. Imagine you go to a bookstore and purchase a copy of “Hamlet.” Then you step into a time machine, head back to Elizabethan England, and find a young William Shakespeare, who has yet to write his famous play. You present him with the book, which he copies and distributes as his own. Centuries later, copies of his version still exist, ending up in the bookstore where you purchased “Hamlet.” So, who actually wrote the play?
If your brain is starting to feel a bit puzzled, you’re on the right track! Hi, I’m Erin McCarthy, and this is The List Show. These time travel paradoxes have been the subject of countless sci-fi plots and are actually a hot topic of debate in the field of quantum physics, but they remain unresolved, as evidenced by how many different answers get proposed for them. While possibly frustrating, this is the essence of paradoxes—self-contradictory, logically impossible, or simply unanswerable questions that are likely to keep you up at night.
Today, I’m going to share with you a number of paradoxes that are sure to challenge your thinking, from a very conflicted Pinocchio to a hotel with infinite rooms. Let’s get started!
One of the more famous paradoxes, thanks in part to the Marvel show “WandaVision,” is the Ship of Theseus paradox. Here’s a brief summary: Theseus was a mythical king and hero of Athens, known for slaying the Minotaur among other feats. He did a lot of sailing, and his famed ship was eventually kept in an Athenian harbor as a sort of memorial. As time went on, the ship’s wood began to rot in various places, and those wooden pieces would be replaced one by one. This process continued until the entire ship was made up of new pieces of wood. This thought experiment asks the question: Is this completely refurbished vessel still the Ship of Theseus?
Let’s take it a step further. What if someone else took all of the discarded original pieces of wood and reassembled them into a ship? Would this object be Theseus’s ship? And if so, what do we make of the restored ship sitting in the harbor? This paradox is all about the nature of identity over time and has been the subject of philosophical discussions for thousands of years. It appears in other forms, such as the question of the grandfather’s axe, and triggers broom, both of which ask whether an object remains the same after all its parts have been replaced. The idea even expands to questions of personal identity: If a person changes drastically over time, so much so that who they are no longer matches any part of who they once were, are they still the same person?
Another paradox about the vague nature of identity is the Sorites paradox. The premise is fairly simple and generally involves a heap of sand. If you don’t have a spare heap of sand on you, it will suffice to simply imagine one in your head. Now, let’s take away a single grain of sand from the heap. It’s still almost certainly a heap of sand. Now take away another grain—still a heap. If we continue this enough times, eventually it will be down to one grain of sand, which is almost certainly not a heap anymore. When did the sand cease being a heap and start being something else? The Sorites paradox is all about the vagueness of language because the word “heap” doesn’t have a specific quantity assigned to it; the nature of a heap is subjective.
It also leads to false premises. For example, if you try the paradox in reverse, you start with a single grain of sand, which is not a heap. Then one could argue that one grain of sand plus another grain of sand is also not a heap. This continues until even the statement “a million grains of sand is not a heap,” which, as we know, does not make sense. The name of the paradox comes from the Greek word “soros,” which means heap or pile. It’s often attributed to the abilities of Miletus, a logician from the 4th century BCE, who was basically a paradox machine. Most of his paradoxes deal with semantic fallacies, like the horn paradox.
If we accept the idea that what you have not lost, you have, then consider the fact that you have not lost your horns. Therefore, you must have horns. Yes, most of his paradoxes are just as infuriating! However, one of his more famous paradoxes, the liar paradox, is still discussed today. Here it is: “This sentence is false.” That’s it! Just think about it for a minute. If the statement is true, then that means the sentence is in fact false, as it claims. But that would then mean that the sentence is false, and if the sentence “this sentence is false” is false, then that means it’s true. But if it’s true that it’s false, then… okay, you get the picture—it goes on and on forever.
The liar’s paradox has been discussed and adapted many times throughout history, eventually leading us to my favorite version, the Pinocchio paradox. It follows the same general structure but with an added visual component for flair. Imagine Pinocchio uttering the statement, “My nose grows longer.” Now, if he’s telling the truth, then his nose should grow longer, like he said. But as we know, Pinocchio’s nose only grows if he’s telling a lie, which means that if his nose did grow longer, then the statement would have been false. But if “my nose grows longer” is false, then it should not have grown in the first place. This version of the paradox was created in 2001 by philosopher Peter Eldridge Smith’s eleven-year-old daughter. Peter summarized it neatly like this: “Pinocchio’s nose will grow if and only if it does not.”
Another variant of the liar paradox actually helped shape language in the 16th century. A crocodile grabs a child from the banks of a river. His horrified mother is told by the crocodile that he will return the child only if the mother can correctly guess whether the crocodile will return him. If she guesses that he will be returned and she is correct, the crocodile will return him, no problem. If she is not correct, the crocodile will keep him. However, if she guesses that the crocodile will not return him, an interesting paradox occurs. If she is correct, then the crocodile must return the boy, but in doing so, he breaks his word and contradicts her answer. If she is incorrect and the crocodile actually was going to return the boy, he will now have to keep him, which means he’s now breaking his word.
Due to the popularity of this paradox, the word “crocodile” came to be used to refer to any similarly paradoxical dilemma. The interesting number paradox is debatably not a paradox at all, though it’s often called one. We stumbled on it while researching the script and really wanted to share it with you. It basically goes to prove that all numbers are interesting, even the boring ones, which are actually interesting, of course, and not boring at all. Because they’re boring, interesting in this case means it has something unique to it. For example, one is the first non-zero natural number, two is the smallest prime number, three is the first odd prime number. The list can go on and on until you reach the first uninteresting number. It doesn’t have anything special or fascinating about it, but being the first uninteresting number you stumbled upon, it is in fact unique and therefore interesting.
This idea was born out of a discussion between the mathematicians Srinivasa Ramanujan and G.H. Hardy. Hardy remarked that the number of the taxicab he had recently written in 1729 was a rather dull one. Ramanujan responded that it actually was interesting, being the smallest number that is the sum of two cubes in two different ways. Ah yes, of course, that’s what I was about to say as well!
While most paradoxes are presented through a spoken or written philosophical prompt, some are visual in nature. Take for example the Penrose triangle. Just a warning: if you stare at it too long, it may confuse you! It’s an object that is described by one of its creators as impossibility in its purest form. But the weird part is you can build one and show it to people. Obviously, it’s a trick of proportions and viewing angles, but even after you reveal the trick, people will still see it as an impossible triangle.
Let’s end today with a dizzying mathematical paradox that takes place in, of all places, a fancy hotel. Hilbert’s paradox of the grand hotel is a famous thought experiment meant to show the counter-intuitive nature of infinity. Imagine walking into a big beautiful hotel looking for a room. How big? Infinitely big! This hotel has a countably infinite number of rooms. However, all the rooms are currently occupied by a countably infinite number of guests. Countably infinite means you can one-to-one attach a natural number to everything in the set. One might assume that the hotel would not be able to accommodate you, let alone more guests, but Hilbert’s paradox proves that this is not the case.
In order to accommodate you, the hotel could hypothetically move the guest in room 1 to room 2. Simultaneously, the guest in room 2 could be moved to room 3, and so on, which would move every guest from their current room x to a new room x plus 1. As there are infinite rooms, everyone would get a new room, and now room 1 is totally vacant. Enjoy your stay!
Let’s say 3,000 people arrive in one room—no problem! Just repeat the process, but instead of x plus one, simply do x plus y, with y being three thousand. What if a countably infinite number of people line up behind you, each of whom wants a room? We have a solution to that too! The pattern would now be 2x. Simply move the guest in room 1 to room 2, the guest in room 2 to room 4, and the guest in room 3 to room 6, and so on. This would leave all the odd-numbered rooms open, so each new guest could take one of the newly vacated odd-numbered rooms, and the previous patrons would all be moved to the next even room.
The basis of the grand hotel paradox is the idea of counter-intuitive results that are still provably true. In this example, the statements “there is a guest in every room” and “no more guests can be accommodated” are not the same thing because of the nature of infinity. In a normal set of numbers, such as the number of rooms in a normal hotel, the number of odd-numbered rooms would obviously be smaller than the total number of rooms. But in the case of infinity, this is not the case, as there are an infinite number of odd numbers and an infinite number of total numbers.
This paradox was first introduced by philosopher David Hilbert in a 1924 lecture and has been used to demonstrate various principles of infinity ever since. Personally, the concept of infinity is quite perplexing, and if I walked into the grand hotel and they told me all the rooms were occupied, I would simply go down the street to the nearest Holiday Inn, thank you very much!
Thanks for watching this episode of The List Show! I hope your brain hasn’t melted into a big pile of goop like mine has. Let us know your favorite mind-boggling puzzle in the comments below, and I’ll see you next time!
—
This version maintains the content while ensuring it is appropriate for all audiences.
Paradox – A statement or proposition that, despite sound reasoning from acceptable premises, leads to a conclusion that seems senseless, logically unacceptable, or self-contradictory. – The paradox of Schrödinger’s cat challenges our understanding of quantum mechanics by presenting a scenario where a cat can be simultaneously alive and dead.
Time – A continuous, measurable quantity in which events occur in a sequence proceeding from the past through the present to the future. – In Einstein’s theory of relativity, time is not absolute but is relative to the observer’s frame of reference.
Identity – The relation each thing bears just to itself, often discussed in terms of what makes an entity distinct and recognizable. – In philosophy, the Ship of Theseus is a thought experiment that explores the nature of identity and whether an object that has had all of its components replaced remains fundamentally the same object.
Language – A system of symbols and rules used for communication, often analyzed in philosophy for its role in shaping human thought and understanding. – Wittgenstein’s later work emphasizes the idea that the meaning of language is rooted in its use within specific forms of life.
Truth – The property of being in accord with fact or reality, often explored in philosophy through various theories such as correspondence, coherence, and pragmatism. – The correspondence theory of truth posits that statements are true if they correspond to the facts of the world.
Logic – The systematic study of the principles of valid inference and correct reasoning. – In formal logic, a valid argument is one where if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true.
Infinity – A concept describing something without any bound or larger than any natural number, often encountered in mathematics and philosophy. – The concept of infinity is crucial in calculus, where it is used to describe quantities that grow without bound.
Reality – The state of things as they actually exist, as opposed to an idealistic or notional idea of them. – Philosophers debate whether reality is independent of our perceptions or constructed by our minds.
Uniqueness – The quality of being the only one of its kind, often discussed in philosophy in terms of individual identity and existence. – The uniqueness of personal identity raises questions about what makes each person distinct from others, despite sharing common characteristics.
Complexity – The state or quality of being intricate or complicated, often used in philosophy and science to describe systems with many interconnected parts. – The complexity of the human brain poses significant challenges for understanding consciousness and cognitive processes.
