The film “Gattaca” derives its name from the first letters of the four DNA bases: G, A, T, and C. This clever nod to genetics sets the stage for a deeper exploration of DNA and gene editing, which is the focus of my recent video, “Mutant Menu.” If you haven’t watched it yet, I highly recommend doing so, as it will provide context for the discussion that follows. I’m thrilled to finally share “Mutant Menu” after a year of development. It’s a unique project for me, both in style and length, running 37 minutes. The response has been overwhelmingly positive, and I’m excited to dive into some of the comments and questions you’ve shared.
Kyle Chamberlain commented, “Absolutely we should design our DNA… not exceeding the limits of what we know, of course. Research first, application later.” This sentiment was echoed by many, emphasizing the importance of scientific exploration before practical application. However, the ethical implications of DNA design are significant. Caesar Occum raised concerns about the potential for genetic modification to become prohibitively expensive, widening the gap between the wealthy and the less fortunate. Similarly, Simon Stucki highlighted the existing disparities in healthcare between developed and developing nations, questioning whether gene editing might exacerbate these inequalities.
Aquamonkeyg posed an intriguing question: “Do you own the rights to your genetic code, or do your parents?” This touches on a fascinating area of bioethics. Personally, I believe that once your genetic code is formed, it becomes uniquely yours, granting you the right to make decisions about it. This raises further questions about gene editing in minors—should they have the autonomy to decide, or is parental consent necessary?
Many viewers shared their thoughts on the documentary, and I aimed to present the topic objectively, allowing you to form your own opinions. Dragon Skunk’s comment resonated with me: “I hate the ‘playing god’ expression.” I prefer “tinkering with nature,” as it acknowledges the evolutionary process and our role within it. The quote at 10:25, “Science fiction is now becoming science fact,” captures the essence of our current reality, where once-unimaginable advancements are now commonplace.
John Vincent humorously noted my fondness for showcasing my dog, Luna Labradoodle, who indeed has her own Instagram account. On a more serious note, I was moved by those who shared personal experiences with genetic diseases and their desire to prevent passing them on to future generations. Some comments advocated for advancing gene editing, arguing that the potential benefits outweigh the risks. However, others cautioned that a world of “perfect” humans might lack diversity and lead to new challenges.
The discussions on longevity and the quest for immortality prompted me to consider the psychological implications of extended lifespans and widespread genetic modification. How will our mental resilience adapt to these changes? Will new therapies or treatments emerge to address the psychological effects of living longer or being genetically enhanced?
I’m grateful for the supportive comments regarding the educational value and production quality of “Mutant Menu.” Many of you expressed interest in more long-form content, and I am eager to explore these opportunities, contingent on future funding. If you have suggestions for topics that warrant a 30-minute investigation, please share them in the comments.
With “Mutant Menu” now released, I have more time to focus on my regular episodes. If you have questions or ideas for “Braincraft,” please leave a comment, and I’ll consider them for future episodes. Lastly, someone humorously suggested creating a pig with more fat for better bacon—a reminder that even in serious discussions, there’s always room for a bit of humor!
Engage in a structured debate with your classmates on the ethical implications of DNA design. Consider the potential benefits and risks, and discuss whether gene editing should be regulated. Use Kyle Chamberlain’s and Caesar Occum’s comments as starting points for your arguments.
Conduct a research project exploring the concept of genetic code ownership. Investigate legal, ethical, and personal perspectives on whether individuals or their parents own genetic rights. Present your findings in a class presentation, referencing Aquamonkeyg’s question as a basis for your exploration.
Write a short story or essay that imagines a future where gene editing is commonplace. Reflect on the quote “Science fiction is now becoming science fact” and explore the societal impacts of such advancements. Share your work with peers for feedback and discussion.
Organize a panel discussion with classmates to explore the potential consequences of gene editing on human diversity. Discuss the balance between preventing genetic diseases and maintaining genetic diversity, inspired by comments on personal stories and future considerations.
Participate in a workshop that examines the psychological effects of extended lifespans due to genetic modification. Discuss potential mental health challenges and propose solutions or therapies that could support individuals in adapting to these changes.
Sure! Here’s a sanitized version of the transcript:
—
The title of the film “Gattaca” is based on the first letters of the four bases of DNA—G, A, T, C. Maybe I could start a new channel focused on science fiction movie trivia. Hey, everyone! It’s Vanessa. This week, I wanted to talk about the video that came out last week called “Mutant Menu.” If you haven’t seen it, please check it out. This will make a lot more sense after you’ve watched it. I’m super excited to finally release “Mutant Menu,” as I’ve been working on it quietly for about a year now. I was a bit nervous to share it because it’s quite different from anything I’ve done before, and it’s long—37 minutes! You all had so many lovely things to say about both the documentary and the subject matter, so I wanted to take this opportunity to do a Q&A or comment response video, which I also haven’t done before. So, there are lots of new beginnings for us right now.
Kyle Chamberlain says, “Absolutely we should design our DNA… not exceeding the limits of what we know, of course. Research first, application later.” Many people in the comments shared this view, suggesting we should focus on the science and worry about the repercussions later. However, I care about the ethics involved. There are many ethical questions raised in the film that you echoed in the comments. Caesar Occum expressed concern about the potential for this to become very expensive, leading to a greater divide between the rich and the poor. Simon Stucki pointed out the existing imbalance in medical care between third-world and first-world countries and questioned whether it’s wise to exacerbate that imbalance.
Aquamonkeyg raised an interesting question: “Do you own the rights to your genetic code, or do your parents?” I love bioethics questions like this, which you would know if you subscribe to “Braincraft,” as I make many videos on such topics. Personally, I believe that once your genetic codes have been combined to create your own, it’s unique to you, and you should have the right to make decisions about it. In cases of gene editing, it raises questions about minors wanting to edit their genes—who decides if they should? Is it them, or do they need parental consent?
Many of your comments echoed my thoughts. I aimed to be objective and unbiased in the documentary so you could come to your own conclusions about DNA design and gene editing. One point I really agree with is from Dragon Skunk, who said, “I hate the ‘playing god’ expression.” I prefer “tinkering with nature,” as it feels more inclusive and acknowledges evolution.
I love the quote from the person at 10:25: “Science fiction is now becoming science fact.” It’s fascinating how things that once seemed unimaginable are now routine, and people often forget that they were once considered impossible.
John Vincent commented, “You just love showing off your dog.” Indeed, I do! She has an Instagram account you can follow—Luna Labradoodle. On a more serious note, I was touched by how some people opened up in the comments about genetic diseases they have and what they would do to avoid passing them on to their children. Many shared sentiments like, “I have three different genetic diseases, and there’s a high chance my children will have at least one of them. I’d do anything to prevent that.”
Some comments suggested we should just move forward with gene editing, with one person stating, “I really do not see the downside to this. We have a chance to make humans better. The risk is worth it.” However, others pointed out that if everyone were perfect, the world would become quite boring, and we might start finding flaws in other things just to have something to do.
There were many discussions about longevity and the desire for immortality or maintaining quality of life for many years. This got me thinking about mental resilience—what happens to our psychology if we live significantly longer or if genetically modified people become common? How do we deal with that psychologically? Will there be new types of therapies or treatments?
I’m incredibly humbled by the lovely comments you all left. Many expressed disbelief that a video I worked so hard on received so few views, stating it was educational and well-edited. Your move, YouTube!
Gustavo Riberio asked about the colors of the diner seats, and Rusk Reader commented on my presentation style. There were many suggestions for more long-form content, and I would love to explore that. For “Mutant Menu,” I was fortunate to receive extra funding from Screen Australia, YouTube, and PBS Digital Studios, so it depends on future opportunities. If you have topics that deserve a 30-minute investigation, please let me know in the comments!
Now that “Mutant Menu” has been released, I have more time to plan my usual episodes. If you have questions or ideas for “Braincraft,” please leave a comment, and I’ll consider them for future episodes.
Lastly, someone humorously suggested making a pig with more fat for better bacon. Well, I’m always thinking about bacon—and pizza!
—
This version maintains the essence of the original transcript while removing any informal language and personal identifiers.
DNA – Deoxyribonucleic acid, a molecule that carries the genetic instructions used in the growth, development, functioning, and reproduction of all known living organisms and many viruses. – The double-helix structure of DNA was first described by Watson and Crick in 1953.
Gene – A sequence of nucleotides in DNA or RNA that encodes the synthesis of a gene product, either RNA or protein. – The BRCA1 gene is known to significantly increase the risk of breast cancer when mutated.
Editing – The process of making changes to the nucleotide sequence of a gene or genome. – CRISPR-Cas9 is a revolutionary tool for gene editing that allows scientists to modify DNA with high precision.
Ethics – The moral principles that govern a person’s behavior or the conducting of an activity, especially in scientific research. – The ethics of cloning humans is a topic of heated debate in the scientific community.
Genetic – Relating to genes or heredity. – Genetic disorders can be inherited from one or both parents and may manifest at birth or later in life.
Modification – The alteration of the characteristics of an organism by manipulating its genetic material. – Genetic modification of crops can lead to increased resistance to pests and diseases.
Bioethics – The study of the ethical issues emerging from advances in biology and medicine. – Bioethics addresses the moral dilemmas posed by new technologies such as genetic engineering and stem cell research.
Diversity – The range of different species, genetic variations, and ecosystems in a particular area. – Biodiversity is crucial for ecosystem resilience and the provision of ecosystem services.
Longevity – The length of time that an organism is expected to live under natural conditions. – Research on the longevity of certain species can provide insights into the aging process in humans.
Psychology – The scientific study of the mind and behavior, including the biological influences, social pressures, and environmental factors that affect how people think, act, and feel. – Understanding the psychology of decision-making can help improve public health strategies.
