Have you ever heard of Bigfoot? It’s a mysterious creature, often described as a large, ape-like being, that people claim to have seen in the forests of the Pacific Northwest in the United States. Bigfoot is part of a group of creatures known as “cryptids,” which are animals that some people believe exist based on stories and folklore, but haven’t been scientifically proven. The word “cryptid” comes from the Ancient Greek word “kryptos,” meaning hidden.
Stories of strange creatures have been around for ages. Ancient naturalists wrote about bizarre beings like men with dog heads and beasts that only smelled flowers. But why do people still search for creatures like Bigfoot today? Well, our planet is vast, and discovering new species, although rare, is possible. For example, in 2013, scientists found a new animal called the olinguito in South America. Other animals like the okapi, giant panda, and mountain gorilla were also discovered partly due to local legends.
The legend of Bigfoot, also known as Sasquatch, has roots in the stories of native peoples in British Columbia. The modern Bigfoot craze began in 1957 when a town called Harrison Hot Springs announced a Sasquatch hunt. A man named William Roe claimed to have seen a 6-foot tall ape-like creature, and soon after, newspapers reported footprints at construction sites managed by Raymond Wallace. These events helped shape the image of Bigfoot we know today.
In 1967, a film supposedly showing Bigfoot was released, but there are problems with these stories. No one remembers meeting William Roe, and after Ray Wallace passed away in 2002, his family admitted that the footprints were fake. The film itself looks more like a person in a costume than a real creature.
Despite the hoaxes, the Bigfoot legend persists. People still report sightings, and there are TV shows and tours dedicated to the search. However, as scientist Frank J. Sulloway said, “Anecdotes do not make a science.” Just because many people claim to have seen Bigfoot doesn’t mean it’s real. Our brains can be easily tricked, and eyewitness accounts aren’t reliable proof.
Occam’s razor is a principle that suggests we should choose the simplest explanation with the fewest assumptions. When we look at Bigfoot sightings, they often match the behavior and range of the American black bear. So, the simplest explanation might be that people are mistaking bears for Bigfoot.
Many have claimed to have found physical evidence of Bigfoot, like hair samples. However, when scientists analyzed these samples, they all matched known animals. This doesn’t prove Bigfoot doesn’t exist, but it shows that the evidence isn’t convincing.
In science, claims need to be testable. If you say you have a pink dragon in your garage, I should be able to see it. If you add conditions like it’s invisible or can teleport, it becomes impossible to test, making it a bad claim. Philosopher Karl Popper argued that if a claim can’t be proven false, it’s not science but pseudoscience.
We can’t completely disprove Bigfoot’s existence, but it’s not the right question for science. A good scientific theory would suggest that there isn’t a giant primate in North America or a monster in a Scottish lake. To prove these ideas false, we would need to find one. Until then, the legend of Bigfoot remains just that—a legend. Stay curious and keep exploring!
Research the history of Bigfoot sightings and create a timeline that highlights key events, such as the first reported sightings, significant hoaxes, and scientific investigations. Use online resources to gather information and present your timeline in a creative format, such as a digital poster or a physical display in the classroom.
Participate in a class debate about whether Bigfoot is a real creature or just a myth. Prepare arguments for both sides, using evidence from the article and additional research. Practice your public speaking skills and engage in a respectful discussion with your classmates.
Imagine you are a scientist tasked with investigating the existence of Bigfoot. Create a detailed plan outlining how you would conduct your research, including methods for gathering evidence, analyzing data, and presenting your findings. Consider the challenges you might face and how you would address them.
Find a reported Bigfoot sighting online and analyze it using Occam’s razor. Discuss the possible explanations for the sighting and determine which is the simplest and most likely. Share your analysis with the class and compare your conclusions with those of your peers.
Write your own short story or comic strip about a Bigfoot encounter, incorporating elements of mythology and folklore. Use your creativity to explore why people might believe in Bigfoot and how such legends are passed down through generations. Share your story with the class and discuss the role of storytelling in shaping cultural beliefs.
**Sanitized Transcript:**
“This episode brought to you by Squarespace. Build it beautiful.”
[MUSIC]
Bigfoot… a mysterious forest ape reported primarily in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. The footprints of this legend reach around the world: thousands of minds, countless websites, podcasts, and YouTube channels dedicated to searching for and examining the evidence for Bigfoot. Bigfoot is one of many so-called “cryptids,” creatures whose existence has been suggested by folklore, but remain, as the Ancient Greeks would say, “kryptos”… hidden.
Tales of monsters, ogres, and wildmen are as old as stories, but the line between legend and science hasn’t always been crystal clear. The bestiaries of ancient naturalists described men with the heads of dogs and hairy, mouthless beasts who only smelled flowers. But that was then… Why do people STILL search for these mysterious creatures? Well, Earth is a big place, and the possibility of finding a new animal species, while small, IS real.
In 2013, scientists discovered the olinguito, a raccoon-sized creature living in the forests of South America. The okapi, giant panda, the komodo dragon, even the mountain gorilla were all discovered, at least in part, thanks to folklore. Even fossil bones, like those of Gigantopithecus, tell us that as recently as 100,000 years ago, 9-foot tall apes walked alongside our human ancestors.
The footprints of Bigfoot lead to British Columbia, where legends of Sasquatch had long circulated among the native peoples. The three pillars that helped build the Bigfoot legend started in 1957 when the town of Harrison Hot Springs announced a Sasquatch hunt. A man named William Roe came forward with an account, two years earlier, of an encounter with a 6-foot tall human-like ape. During the next year, newspapers reported numerous footprints at construction sites run by a man named Raymond Wallace. Sasquatch became… Bigfoot, and a consistent image took shape.
The third pillar, when Bigfoot hit its stride, was starring in a 1967 film… [MUSIC] Of course, there are three tiny problems with these. It seems no one actually remembers meeting William Roe. And when Ray Wallace died in 2002, his family admitted that the footprints had all been a hoax. The famous film shows… something, although when it’s stabilized, I’m definitely feeling more of a “guy in an ape suit” vibe.
Based on this, you’d think the story would end here. But it doesn’t. And that’s what makes Bigfoot so interesting. It continues to be a global myth; eyewitness accounts, tours, television programs continue to roll on. Frank J. Sulloway once said, “Anecdotes do not make a science. Ten anecdotes are no better than one, and a hundred anecdotes are no better than ten.” One of the first rules of science is that “Because I said so” doesn’t make very good proof. Our brains are easy to fool; eyewitness accounts simply aren’t enough to determine if Bigfoot visited the library before track practice or called someone from a parking lot and somehow ended up in these woods.
Let’s cut into this with Occam’s razor: When presented with multiple hypotheses, pick the one with the fewest assumptions. If a pair of underwear goes missing in the laundry, it IS possible that laundry gnomes swiped it as part of some fairy tale profit-making scheme, but a much simpler answer, one with far fewer assumptions, is that it’s just hiding in the bottom of the clothes hamper. Indeed, when we model the ecological range of Bigfoot based on reported sightings and behavior, we get a map that looks disturbingly similar to the American black bear. The hypothesis with fewer assumptions… looks a lot like this.
“That is a bipedal bear.”
What about physical evidence? Many people have claimed to have such evidence for Bigfoot; I’m talking about hair. Enhance. Enhance. When scientists recently analyzed 30 supposed Bigfoot and Yeti hair samples, every single DNA sequence matched that of a known mammal. So does all of this prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Bigfoot doesn’t exist? Unfortunately… that may be impossible to prove. The absence of evidence isn’t the same as evidence of absence.
Let’s say you claim that you’ve got a pink dragon living in your garage. This is easily verifiable. Just take me out to the garage; I would like to see this dragon. But you forgot to tell me that your dragon is shy and invisible. That’s fine… let’s just sprinkle some flour on the floor and catch its footprints. Ah, it turns out that your shy pink invisible dragon can also float. Ohhhkay, well let me just put on these infrared goggles… to which you say the dragon is actually capable of interdimensional teleportation, at which point I am leaving because this is kind of getting ridiculous.
This example was famously used by Carl Sagan in his book “The Demon-Haunted World” to make the point that claims which cannot be tested are just bad claims. Philosopher of science Karl Popper went even further; if a claim can’t be proven false, it’s not science, it’s pseudoscience. In science, we go looking for things that can falsify our claims. The tricky part of this is that scientific claims are never completely proven true; they only continue to NOT be proven false. This doesn’t make science weak; if anything, it makes it stronger.
This is why we can never completely disprove the claim that Bigfoot is real. It’s just not the right question for science. A good scientific theory would be that there is NOT a huge, hairy primate roaming the forests of North America, that there’s NOT an aquatic beast in a Scottish lake that’s been completely landlocked since the end of the last Ice Age. Because all it would take to prove that idea false… is to find one.
Stay curious.
Bigfoot – A legendary creature resembling a large, hairy, human-like being, said to inhabit the forests of North America. – Many people have searched for Bigfoot, but scientific evidence of its existence remains elusive.
Cryptids – Animals or creatures whose existence is suggested but not scientifically proven, often featured in folklore and myths. – Cryptids like the Loch Ness Monster and Bigfoot captivate the imagination of both scientists and enthusiasts.
Science – The systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment. – Science helps us understand the universe by providing evidence-based explanations for natural phenomena.
Evidence – Information or data that supports or refutes a hypothesis, theory, or belief. – Scientists gather evidence through experiments and observations to test their hypotheses.
Claims – Statements or assertions that something is the case, often without providing evidence or proof. – In science, claims must be supported by empirical evidence to be considered valid.
Folklore – The traditional beliefs, customs, and stories of a community, passed through the generations by word of mouth. – Folklore often includes tales of cryptids, which are creatures not recognized by science.
Sightings – Instances of seeing or observing something, often used in the context of unusual or unexplained phenomena. – Reports of Bigfoot sightings have been made across various regions, but none have been scientifically verified.
Hoaxes – Deliberate deceptions or tricks, often intended to mislead people into believing something false. – Some Bigfoot sightings have been revealed as hoaxes, created to fool the public or gain attention.
Explanation – A statement or account that makes something clear or understandable, often based on evidence and reasoning. – Scientists seek explanations for natural events that are consistent with observed data and established theories.
Critical Thinking – The objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgment. – Critical thinking is essential in science to assess the validity of claims and the reliability of evidence.
