In the realm of product design, the allure of creating something visually stunning is akin to the excitement of seeing a concept car. These designs captivate us, making us think, “I’d buy that in a second!” Yet, when these concepts transition from the design studio to the production line, they often lose their initial charm. Why does this happen?
Consider the critical issue of newborn health. Every year, four million babies, primarily in developing countries, die before reaching their first birthday. Astonishingly, about 1.8 million of these deaths could be prevented if we could simply keep these newborns warm during their first few days of life.
In Kathmandu, Nepal, newborn intensive care units are filled with babies wrapped in blankets, who should ideally be in incubators. Often, these incubators are outdated donations from countries like Japan. Without the necessary technicians and spare parts, these donations quickly become obsolete.
Recognizing this problem, we embarked on a mission to create a solution. Collaborating with a leading medical research institution in Boston, we conducted extensive user research overseas. Our approach was rooted in human-centered design, leading us to develop the Neo Nurture infant incubator. This design combined aesthetic appeal with functionality, aiming to inspire manufacturers to adopt and produce it.
However, despite winning numerous awards, the Neo Nurture incubator was never used beyond a photo shoot for Time magazine. This experience taught us that designing for inspiration alone does not guarantee effective outcomes. Our goal shifted to designing for real-world impact, not just creating beautiful products.
In our design process, we considered the needs of various stakeholders, including poor families, rural doctors, and repair technicians. Yet, we overlooked the broader ecosystem involved in a product’s success, such as manufacturing, financing, distribution, and regulation. As Michael Freya Pass suggests, it’s crucial to identify who will choose, use, and pay for a product.
For instance, a hospital director in Bangladesh doesn’t purchase his equipment; those decisions are made by the Ministry of Health or foreign donors. Similarly, multinational medical device manufacturers target emerging markets with a growing middle class, focusing on diseases of affluence.
Our next project involved partnering with MTTS in Vietnam and East Meets West, an American foundation. They expressed a need to address newborn jaundice, a condition affecting two-thirds of newborns worldwide. If untreated, jaundice can lead to severe disabilities or death. The traditional treatment, an exchange transfusion, is both costly and risky. Alternatively, phototherapy, which involves shining bright blue light on the baby’s skin, is a safer option.
However, in crowded facilities in Asia, phototherapy devices are often misused due to a lack of training or equipment like light meters. This highlights a critical lesson: there are no dumb users, only products that fail to meet their needs.
With these insights, we developed the Firefly phototherapy device. From the outset, we engaged with manufacturers to ensure the product was feasible to produce. Firefly features a single bassinet, preventing misuse by making the correct usage the easiest option. We also addressed practical concerns, such as overheating, by sealing the device to protect it from environmental factors.
These experiences underscore the importance of designing for outcomes. It’s not enough to create something beautiful; it must also be practical and effective in real-world settings. By focusing on manufacturing, distribution, and actual usage, we can create designs that truly make a difference.
In conclusion, if we aim to change the world, we must prioritize designing for outcomes. This is the essence of meaningful design. Thank you.
Analyze the case of the Neo Nurture infant incubator. Identify the key reasons why it failed to be adopted despite winning awards. Discuss how a deeper understanding of the ecosystem could have changed the outcome. Present your findings in a group discussion.
Participate in a design thinking workshop where you will work in teams to create a prototype for a medical device aimed at solving a real-world problem. Focus on understanding the needs of all stakeholders involved, from users to manufacturers.
Engage in a role-playing exercise where you assume the roles of different stakeholders in the product design process, such as a hospital director, a manufacturer, and a rural doctor. Discuss the challenges and priorities each stakeholder faces in adopting a new medical device.
Conduct a field research project to explore the challenges faced by healthcare facilities in resource-limited settings. Interview healthcare professionals to understand their needs and constraints. Use this research to propose a design solution that addresses these challenges.
Write a reflective essay on the importance of designing for outcomes rather than aesthetics. Use examples from the article and your own experiences to support your arguments. Discuss how this approach can lead to more impactful and sustainable design solutions.
Here’s a sanitized version of the provided YouTube transcript:
—
[Music][Applause]
I have a great idea that’s going to change the world. It’s fantastic and it’s going to blow your mind. Here’s the thing: everybody loves a beautiful baby. I mean, I was a beautiful baby! Here’s a picture of me and my dad just a couple of days after I was born.
In the world of product design, beautiful babies are like concept cars; they’re the knockouts that make you say, “Oh my God, I’d buy that in a second!” So why is it that this year’s new cars look pretty much exactly like last year’s? What went wrong between the design studio and the factory?
Today, I don’t want to talk about beautiful babies; I want to discuss the awkward adolescence of design—those tricky teenage years where you’re trying to figure out how the world works.
Let’s start with an example from some work we did on newborn health. The problem is that four million babies around the world, mostly in developing countries, die every year before their first birthday. It turns out that half of those, or about 1.8 million newborns, could survive if we could just keep them warm for the first three days, maybe the first week.
This is a newborn intensive care unit in Kathmandu, Nepal. All of these kids in blankets belong in incubators, like this one. This is a donated Japanese incubator that we found in a NICU in Kathmandu. It’s likely that a hospital in Japan upgraded their equipment and donated their old units to Nepal. The problem is that without technicians and spare parts, donations like this quickly turn into junk.
We saw this as a problem we could address. Keeping a baby warm for a week isn’t rocket science! So we got started. We partnered with a leading medical research institution here in Boston and conducted months of user research overseas, thinking like designers and focusing on human-centered design. We created thousands of post-it notes and dozens of prototypes to arrive at this: the Neo Nurture infant incubator.
This design has a lot of smart features built into it, and we felt great about it. The idea was to combine beauty with functionality, inspiring manufacturers and others to take this model and run with it.
Here’s the bad news: the only baby ever actually placed inside the Neo Nurture incubator was during a Time magazine photo shoot. Recognition is fantastic; we want our designs to be seen. It won lots of awards, but it felt like a consolation prize. We wanted to create beautiful things that would genuinely improve the world, and I don’t think that baby was in it long enough to get warm.
It turns out that designing for inspiration doesn’t always lead to effective outcomes. For us, it was either too slow or ineffective. I want to design for outcomes, not just beautiful products.
When we were designing Neo Nurture, we paid a lot of attention to the people who would use it: poor families, rural doctors, overloaded nurses, and repair technicians. We thought we had everything covered, but it turns out there’s a whole constellation of people involved in a product’s success: manufacturing, financing, distribution, and regulation.
Michael Freya Pass says you have to figure out who will choose, use, and pay for a product. I have to ask: who is our customer?
Here’s an example: this is a Bangladeshi hospital director outside his facility. He doesn’t buy any of his equipment; those decisions are made by the Ministry of Health or foreign donors, and it just kind of shows up. Similarly, a multinational medical device manufacturer focuses on emerging markets where the middle class is growing, dealing with diseases of affluence like heart disease and infertility.
Designing for outcomes means thinking about manufacturing and distribution. That was an important lesson.
We took that lesson into our next project. We partnered with an organization called MTTS in Vietnam, which manufactures newborn care technologies for Southeast Asia, and East Meets West, an American foundation that distributes that technology to hospitals in need. We asked them what problem they wanted to solve, and they said, “Let’s work on newborn jaundice.”
Jaundice affects two-thirds of newborns worldwide, and if untreated, it can lead to lifelong disabilities or even death. The common treatment is an exchange transfusion, which is expensive and risky. Another method involves shining bright blue light on the baby’s skin.
Here’s an example of an overhead phototherapy device designed for American hospitals. Here’s how it’s supposed to be used: over the baby, illuminating it. But when sent to a crowded facility in Asia, it’s often misused. The effectiveness of phototherapy depends on light intensity, and without proper training or a light meter, it’s hard to know if it’s working.
We see similar problems elsewhere. In a neonatal intensive care unit, mothers may want to cover their babies with blankets, which isn’t ideal for phototherapy. We’ve learned that there are no dumb users, only products that don’t meet their needs.
When we think about our partner MTTS, they’ve created amazing technologies for treating newborn illnesses. However, every doctor and hospital administrator has seen medical devices on TV and has certain expectations about how they should look. They want something that looks advanced, not just effective.
So, we took all this information and tried to get it right. Here’s what we developed: the Firefly phototherapy device. From the beginning, we talked to manufacturers to ensure we could create a product they could actually make.
Firefly has a single bassinet that only fits one baby, making it clear how to use it. If someone tries to stack babies, it won’t work. We designed it to make the correct usage the easiest option.
We also considered practical issues, like how electronics can get hot. Instead of using vents or fans, we sealed the Firefly to protect it from environmental factors.
These lessons are crucial. As awkward as it was to be a teenager, it’s much worse to be a frustrated designer. If I want to change the world, I need to pay attention to manufacturing, distribution, and actual usage. There’s no excuse for failure.
I’ve learned that if you want to make a difference in the world, you have to design for outcomes. That’s design that matters. Thank you.
[Applause]
—
This version removes any informal language, personal anecdotes, and specific references that may not be suitable for all audiences while retaining the core message and structure of the original transcript.
Design – The process of creating a plan or convention for the construction of an object, system, or measurable human interaction. – The design of the new bridge incorporated both aesthetic appeal and structural integrity to withstand heavy traffic.
Engineering – The application of scientific and mathematical principles to innovate, design, develop, and maintain structures, machines, devices, systems, and processes. – Engineering students often work on projects that require them to apply their knowledge to solve real-world problems.
Health – The state of being free from illness or injury, often considered in the context of designing systems or products that promote well-being. – The engineering team focused on health by designing ergonomic workstations that reduce strain and improve productivity.
Incubator – A facility or program designed to support the successful development of entrepreneurial companies through an array of business support resources and services. – The university’s incubator program helped engineering students turn their innovative ideas into viable startups.
Functionality – The range of operations that can be run on a computer or other electronic system, often considered in the design phase to ensure user needs are met. – The software’s functionality was enhanced to include real-time data analysis, making it more useful for engineering applications.
Stakeholders – Individuals or groups with an interest or concern in a project, whose needs and expectations must be considered in the design and engineering process. – The project team held a meeting with stakeholders to ensure that the new product design met all regulatory and user requirements.
Manufacturing – The process of converting raw materials into finished products through the use of tools, human labor, machinery, and chemical processing. – Advances in manufacturing technology have allowed engineers to produce more complex components with greater precision.
Distribution – The process of making a product or service available for the consumer or business user who needs it, often involving logistics and supply chain management. – The engineering team optimized the distribution network to reduce delivery times and costs for the new product line.
Solutions – Methods or processes of solving a problem, often involving innovative approaches in design and engineering. – The engineering students presented their solutions to the environmental challenges posed by urban development.
Impact – The effect or influence of one thing on another, often considered in terms of how engineering projects affect the environment, society, or economy. – The impact of the new transportation system was significant, reducing commute times and lowering carbon emissions.
