Dirtiest Tricks Used in War

Alphabets Sounds Video

share us on:

The lesson explores various cunning and often underhanded tactics used in warfare throughout history, illustrating how armies have employed deceitful strategies to gain advantages over their opponents. Examples include the American Project Eldest Son during the Vietnam War, Britain’s invasion of Tibet, Nazi Germany’s Operation Grief, and the brutal tactics used in the Iran-Iraq War. These instances highlight the lengths to which military leaders will go, showcasing the complex and sometimes dishonorable nature of conflict.

The Dirtiest Tricks Used in War

In the world of warfare, there’s a saying that the best fight is an unfair one. Soldiers and commanders often go to great lengths to gain an upper hand, sometimes using tactics that can be considered downright sneaky. Let’s explore some of the most cunning strategies ever used in war.

Project Eldest Son (1967-69)

The Vietnam War is infamous for its unconventional warfare, with the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese Army (NVA) using booby traps like punji pits and tripwires against American forces. However, the Americans also had their own tricks up their sleeves. One such tactic was Project Eldest Son, a covert operation by the Military Assistance Command, Vietnam – Studies and Observations Group (MACV-SOG).

Instead of destroying enemy ammunition, Colonel John Singlaub suggested sabotaging it. Inspired by a British tactic from the 1930s, the plan involved planting explosive rounds in enemy depots. These rounds, mainly 7.62mm for AK-47 rifles, would explode when fired, causing distrust between the Vietnamese and their allies. Although the project was eventually leaked and abandoned, it showcased the lengths to which armies would go to gain an advantage.

Britain’s Invasion of Tibet (1903)

At the dawn of the 20th century, Britain and Russia were competing for influence in Central Asia, a rivalry known as the Great Game. Concerned about a potential alliance between Tibet and Russia, the British Viceroy of India, George Nathaniel Curzon, decided to act. Using a minor border incident as a pretext, he sent General Francis Younghusband to invade Tibet.

Armed with superior weaponry, the British forces quickly overpowered the Tibetan army, forcing them to sign a treaty that ceded territory to Britain. This invasion highlighted how geopolitical fears could lead to aggressive and underhanded military actions.

Operation Grief (1944)

In December 1944, as World War II was nearing its end, Nazi Germany launched Operation Grief. Led by Otto Skorzeny, the plan aimed to create chaos among American troops during the Battle of the Bulge. German soldiers who spoke English were trained to impersonate American troops, hoping to disrupt communications and sow confusion.

Despite their efforts, many of the German soldiers struggled to hide their accents, limiting the operation’s success. However, the infiltration did cause paranoia among American forces, leading to stricter security measures. Ultimately, Operation Grief did not achieve its goals, but it remains a notable example of psychological warfare.

Battle of the Marshes (1984)

During the Iran-Iraq War, the Iranian military launched an offensive to break the stalemate. In response, the Iraqi forces used a brutal tactic: electrifying the marshlands to electrocute advancing Iranian soldiers. This strategy resulted in heavy Iranian casualties, although the overall outcome was a costly victory for Iran.

Battle of Pelusium (525 BCE)

Even in ancient times, commanders used clever tactics to gain an edge. During the Persian invasion of Egypt, Emperor Cambyses II reportedly used a unique form of psychological warfare. He released sacred animals, like cats, in front of his troops. The Egyptians, who revered these animals, were reluctant to fight, leading to their defeat.

Throughout history, whether in ancient or modern conflicts, soldiers have often resorted to cunning strategies to outsmart their opponents, even if these tactics might seem dishonorable.

Closing Message

Thank you for exploring these fascinating historical tactics with us. Understanding these strategies helps us appreciate the complexities of warfare throughout history. If you’re interested in learning more, feel free to explore further resources.

  1. Reflecting on Project Eldest Son, how do you think the psychological impact of such tactics compares to their physical effects on the battlefield?
  2. Considering Britain’s invasion of Tibet, what are your thoughts on how geopolitical fears can drive nations to take aggressive actions? Can you think of any modern parallels?
  3. Operation Grief involved impersonation and deception. How do you think such tactics affect the morale and trust within military ranks?
  4. The Battle of the Marshes involved a particularly brutal tactic. How do you think the ethics of warfare have evolved over time, and what lessons can be drawn from such historical events?
  5. Reflect on the use of psychological warfare in the Battle of Pelusium. How important do you think understanding cultural values and beliefs is in modern military strategy?
  6. What are your thoughts on the balance between cunning strategies and ethical considerations in warfare? Can you think of any examples where this balance was successfully achieved?
  7. How do you think the public perception of military tactics, such as those described in the article, influences the way history remembers these events?
  8. After reading about these historical tactics, what insights have you gained about the nature of warfare and the lengths to which armies will go to secure victory?
  1. Research and Presentation on Historical Warfare Tactics

    Choose one of the tactics discussed in the article, such as Project Eldest Son or Operation Grief. Conduct further research on the chosen tactic, focusing on its historical context, execution, and impact. Prepare a short presentation to share your findings with the class, highlighting the ethical considerations and consequences of using such tactics in warfare.

  2. Debate: Ethics of Unconventional Warfare

    Participate in a class debate on the ethics of using unconventional tactics in warfare. Divide into two groups: one supporting the use of such tactics for strategic advantage, and the other opposing them due to ethical concerns. Use examples from the article to support your arguments, and engage in a respectful discussion to explore different perspectives.

  3. Create a Historical Timeline

    Work in small groups to create a timeline that includes the events and tactics mentioned in the article, such as Britain’s invasion of Tibet and the Battle of Pelusium. Include key dates, locations, and a brief description of each event. Present your timeline to the class, and discuss how these tactics influenced the outcomes of the conflicts.

  4. Role-Playing Game: Strategic Decision-Making

    Engage in a role-playing game where you assume the role of a military commander faced with strategic decisions during a historical conflict. Use the tactics from the article as potential strategies, and consider the potential outcomes and ethical implications of each choice. Reflect on how these decisions might affect both the military and civilian populations.

  5. Creative Writing: A Soldier’s Perspective

    Write a short story or diary entry from the perspective of a soldier involved in one of the conflicts mentioned in the article. Describe their experiences, thoughts, and feelings about the use of unconventional tactics. Share your story with the class, and discuss how personal narratives can provide insight into the human impact of warfare strategies.

Sure! Here’s a sanitized version of the provided YouTube transcript:

**The Dirtiest Tricks Pulled in War**

A common military maxim states that the best fight is an unfair one. Those on the battlefield will do everything in their power to gain an advantage over their adversaries, sometimes resorting to what can only be considered dirty tricks in order to stack the odds in their favor. Here are a few of the most underhanded tactics ever employed in war.

**Project Eldest Son (1967-69)**

The Vietnam War is well known for its unconventional tactics, particularly the use of booby traps by the Viet Cong and NVA forces against American and Allied forces. Punji pits, tripwires, and other traps were widely used, becoming a defining characteristic of the conflict. It turns out that the Americans were also willing to use underhanded tactics to gain an advantage.

Members of the MACV-SOG operated in Vietnam conducting covert operations behind enemy lines. Part of their mission was to sabotage enemy ammunition and supply caches, but these efforts had limited success. Colonel John Singlaub proposed an unconventional solution: instead of destroying or capturing found ammunition, they would sabotage it. Inspired by a similar plan carried out by the British during the Waziristan Revolt in the 1930s, this operation was designated Project Eldest Son.

The plan involved planting sabotaged rounds into VC and NVA storage depots. The majority of the rounds would be 7.62mm for use in the AK-47, with their powder charge replaced by a more potent explosive, causing catastrophic failure when fired. The operation aimed to undermine the relationship between the Vietnamese and their Chinese and Eastern Bloc allies. However, the project was eventually leaked to the press and was abandoned.

**Britain’s Invasion of Tibet (1903)**

By the turn of the 20th century, Britain was engaged in the Great Game with Russia, vying for supremacy in Central Asia. The Viceroy of India, George Nathaniel Curzon, sought to foster a closer relationship with Tibet, a Chinese protectorate at the time. Fearing a potential alliance between Tibet and Russia, Curzon assembled a military force under General Francis Younghusband to invade Tibet.

Using a flimsy excuse of Tibetan troops crossing into Nepal, Younghusband invaded. During the conflict, the British forces, armed with modern weaponry, easily overmatched the Tibetan forces, leading to a swift and brutal victory. Tibet was forced to sign a humiliating treaty, ceding territory to British control.

**Operation Grief (1944)**

In December 1944, as Nazi Germany was faltering, Adolf Hitler ordered Operation Grief, led by Otto Skorzeny. The operation aimed to sow confusion among American forces during the Ardennes offensive. Skorzeny recruited English-speaking German soldiers, who were trained to blend in with American troops.

Despite their efforts, many of the soldiers retained their German accents, and the operation’s effectiveness was limited. Nevertheless, the confusion caused by the infiltrators led to heightened paranoia among American forces, resulting in increased security measures. Ultimately, Operation Grief and the Ardennes offensive were failures for Germany.

**Battle of the Marshes (1984)**

During the Iran-Iraq War, the Iranian military launched an offensive to break the stalemate. The Iraqis employed various tactics, including the use of electricity in the marshlands to electrocute Iranian soldiers during assaults. This brutal tactic resulted in significant Iranian casualties, although the operation was ultimately seen as a pyrrhic victory for Iran.

**Battle of Pilosium (525 BCE)**

In ancient times, commanders also resorted to dirty tactics to gain an advantage. During the invasion of Egypt by Persian Emperor Cambyses II, it is alleged that he used a unique form of hostage-taking by releasing sacred animals, such as cats, in front of his advancing army. The Egyptians, unwilling to risk offending their deities, were routed from the battlefield.

Whether in ancient battles or modern conflicts, soldiers are often willing to do whatever it takes to gain an advantage over their opponents, even if these tactics may seem dishonorable.

**Closing Message**

Thank you for your interest in our content. We appreciate your support in preserving and promoting history. If you’d like to learn more about how you can help, please visit the link in the description below.

This version maintains the core information while removing any inappropriate language or sensitive content.

WarfareThe engagement in or the activities involved in war or conflict. – The development of trench warfare during World War I marked a significant shift in military strategy.

TacticsThe specific actions or strategies planned to achieve a particular short-term goal in battle or conflict. – The general’s tactics during the battle were crucial in securing a victory for the allied forces.

InvasionAn instance of invading a country or region with an armed force. – The invasion of Normandy in 1944 was a pivotal moment in World War II.

OperationA planned military action or maneuver, often involving multiple coordinated activities. – Operation Desert Storm was a major military operation during the Gulf War.

SoldiersIndividuals who serve in an army and are trained for combat. – The soldiers displayed immense bravery during the battle, earning them numerous commendations.

StrategyA plan of action designed to achieve a long-term or overall aim, especially in military contexts. – The strategy employed by the generals involved cutting off supply lines to weaken the enemy forces.

CasualtiesMembers of the armed forces who are killed, wounded, or missing in action. – The battle resulted in heavy casualties on both sides, prompting calls for a ceasefire.

HistoryThe study of past events, particularly in human affairs. – Understanding the history of ancient civilizations helps us comprehend the development of modern societies.

MilitaryRelating to or characteristic of soldiers or armed forces. – The military played a crucial role in maintaining peace and order during the crisis.

ConflictA serious disagreement or argument, typically a protracted one, often involving armed forces. – The conflict between the two nations lasted for several years before a peace treaty was signed.

All Video Lessons

Login your account

Please login your account to get started.

Don't have an account?

Register your account

Please sign up your account to get started.

Already have an account?