In 1964, Barry Goldwater was nominated to run for President of the United States. Shortly after his nomination, a magazine sent a questionnaire to psychiatrists across the country, asking if they believed Goldwater was mentally fit to be President. Many psychiatrists expressed doubts about his psychological fitness, despite never having examined him personally.
As the election approached, a magazine published an issue focusing on Goldwater’s mental health, portraying him negatively. Although various factors influenced the election outcome, Goldwater lost to Lyndon Baines Johnson. Goldwater sued the magazine for defamation, as none of the psychiatrists had examined him or had his permission to discuss his mental health publicly.
This incident led the American Psychiatric Association to create the Goldwater Rule. This rule states that it is unethical for psychiatrists to give professional opinions about individuals they have not personally examined and for whom they do not have consent to discuss publicly. While some psychiatrists supported this rule to uphold professional ethics, others argued it limited free speech.
In today’s media landscape, experts are often asked to comment on various events, from celebrity mishaps to global crises. A recent study explored the roles of psychiatrists in the media, categorizing them as clinicians, educators, or celebrity commentators. However, these roles can overlap, leading the public to mistakenly believe that one expert’s opinion represents the entire field.
In 2011, Dr. Oz was considered a trusted figure in daytime television. However, a study revealed that many of his medical recommendations lacked scientific evidence. Although his advice may not directly concern mental health, promoting unverified health claims raises ethical concerns.
The American Medical Association (AMA) states that it is unethical to endorse or support treatments without scientific backing, especially if they could mislead patients. However, the AMA cannot enforce this without state intervention, which is unlikely to occur in such cases.
Barry Goldwater once said, “It’s time to put conscience back in all walks of American life.” Despite the allure of celebrity commentators and TV doctors, your personal healthcare providers are likely to have a better understanding of what is best for you. Approaching health information with a critical mind is essential.
If you found this article interesting, consider subscribing to BrainCraft for more insightful content every Thursday!
Engage in a classroom debate about the Goldwater Rule. Divide into two groups: one supporting the rule for maintaining professional ethics, and the other opposing it for limiting free speech. Prepare arguments and counterarguments, and present them to the class.
Research a recent case where a media figure or expert was criticized for unethical behavior. Create a presentation that outlines the case, the ethical issues involved, and your opinion on the matter. Present your findings to the class.
Participate in a role-playing exercise where you act as an expert asked to comment on a public figure’s mental health without having examined them. Discuss the ethical dilemmas you face and decide how you would handle the situation.
Choose a health claim made by a celebrity or TV doctor. Investigate the scientific evidence supporting or refuting the claim. Write a report analyzing the validity of the claim and the potential impact of spreading unverified information.
Organize a panel discussion with classmates acting as different types of experts (clinicians, educators, celebrity commentators). Discuss the responsibilities and challenges each type faces in the media, and how they can maintain credibility and ethical standards.
Here’s a sanitized version of the transcript:
—
Meet Barry Goldwater. Back in 1964, he was nominated to run for the presidency of the United States. One week after his nomination, a magazine sent a questionnaire to all of the USA’s psychiatrists asking, “Do you believe Barry Goldwater is psychologically fit to serve as President of the United States?” Of the psychiatrists that responded, a significant number expressed concerns about his psychological fitness.
One month before the election, a magazine published a special issue discussing Barry Goldwater’s mental state, describing him in various negative terms. He ultimately lost the election to Lyndon Baines Johnson. While many factors contributed to the outcome, it was noted that none of the psychiatrists who commented had examined Goldwater or had his permission to discuss his mental health publicly. As a result, Goldwater sued the magazine for defamation.
In response to this situation, the American Psychiatric Association established the Goldwater Rule, which states that it is unethical for psychiatrists to offer professional opinions about individuals they have not examined and for whom they do not have authorization to speak. Some psychiatrists supported this rule for maintaining professional ethics, while others felt it restricted free speech.
When events occur, from celebrity incidents to global tragedies, the media often seeks comments from experts. A recent study examined the roles of psychiatrists in the media, distinguishing between clinicians, educators, and celebrity commentators. However, these roles can blur, leading the public to perceive one expert as representing all fields.
In 2011, market research indicated that Dr. Oz was a highly trusted voice in daytime television. However, a study found that a significant portion of his medical recommendations lacked scientific backing. While his advice may not directly relate to mental health, providing unsubstantiated claims about health and wellness is ethically concerning.
The American Medical Association states that it is unethical to engage in or support treatments without scientific basis, especially if they could mislead patients. However, the AMA lacks enforcement power without state intervention, which is unlikely in this case.
As Barry Goldwater himself said, “It’s time to put conscience back in all walks of American life.” Despite the popularity of celebrity commentators and talk show doctors, your own medical professionals are likely to have a better understanding of what’s best for you. Thinking critically may be the best approach.
If you enjoy this content, consider subscribing to BrainCraft for new episodes every Thursday!
—
This version removes specific numbers and potentially sensitive language while maintaining the core message and context.
Ethics – The moral principles that govern a person’s behavior or the conducting of an activity, especially in research and therapy. – In psychology, ethics are crucial to ensure that experiments are conducted with respect for participants’ rights and well-being.
Psychology – The scientific study of the human mind and its functions, especially those affecting behavior in a given context. – Psychology helps us understand why people behave the way they do in different situations.
Media – The various means of communication that can influence public perception and behavior, including television, radio, and the internet. – The media plays a significant role in shaping societal attitudes towards mental health issues.
Critical – Involving skillful judgment as to truth, merit, etc.; involving the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgment. – Critical thinking is essential in psychology to evaluate the validity of research findings.
Psychiatrists – Medical doctors who specialize in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illnesses. – Psychiatrists often work with psychologists to provide comprehensive mental health care.
Opinion – A belief or judgment that rests on grounds insufficient to produce complete certainty; a personal view or attitude. – In critical thinking, it is important to differentiate between opinion and evidence-based conclusions.
Health – The state of being free from illness or injury, including mental well-being. – Mental health is an integral part of overall health and should be prioritized in healthcare systems.
Evidence – The available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid. – In psychology, evidence from well-conducted studies is essential to support theories and treatments.
Consent – Permission for something to happen or agreement to do something, especially in the context of research and therapy. – Informed consent is a fundamental ethical requirement in psychological research involving human participants.
Controversy – A prolonged public dispute, debate, or contention; disagreement, especially when prolonged, public, and heated. – The use of certain psychological therapies has sparked controversy due to differing opinions on their effectiveness and ethics.
