Imagine living on a planet where life depends on a special substance called Nuronium. This element is crucial for your species, which is quite similar to humans, because it helps with thinking and memory. Without Nuronium, people struggle to imagine, reflect, and even remember things over time. However, Nuronium is not just important for mental functions; it also serves as a clean energy source that has helped your civilization thrive for many years.
Recently, scientists have discovered a serious problem: the source of Nuronium has been damaged and is now releasing a pollutant that affects fertility. If your planet continues to rely on Nuronium, your species could face extinction in 100 years. But there is hope. Scientists have identified a passing comet that contains an alternative energy source called Polixate. This new element would not cause infertility and could provide renewable energy like Nuronium. However, it would not support cognitive functions in the same way. With Polixate, people would lose creativity and long-term memories, and eventually, your culture could disappear.
The comet will only be around for a few days, so your society’s leaders must make a quick decision: should they continue using Nuronium or switch to Polixate? The board is divided, and they are waiting for your deciding vote.
Dr. Taylof and their group argue for continuing with Nuronium. They believe that your culture—centuries of literature, music, art, and advancements—is what gives life meaning. Without memories and the ability to create, future generations would live without purpose. Dr. Taylof argues that if future generations cannot contribute to the civilization they inherit, there is no reason to try to preserve them. They believe that no one is harmed by relying on Nuronium, and your species should accept its fate with dignity.
On the other hand, Dr. Kahan and their supporters strongly disagree. They acknowledge that switching to Polixate would lower your people’s quality of life, but they believe that as long as basic needs are met, people could still find happiness, similar to simpler life forms. Dr. Kahan emphasizes that preserving life is incredibly valuable. They believe that every member of your species contributes to the overall well-being of your people, so ensuring your species continues to exist would enhance collective happiness.
Dr. Taylof counters that a meaningful life involves more than just happiness; it includes preserving culture and traditions. They argue that merely existing, like contented pets, lacks value. Meanwhile, supporters of Polixate argue that choosing extinction is fundamentally wrong. Dr. Kahan states that there is no moral difference between actions taken and those that could have been avoided. To knowingly choose extinction is akin to committing a grave injustice.
Both sides present compelling arguments, but the council needs your vote now. What will it be: continue with Nuronium for a while, or switch to Polixate for the long term?
Form two groups and engage in a structured debate. One group will argue in favor of continuing with Nuronium, while the other will advocate for switching to Polixate. Use evidence from the article to support your arguments. After the debate, reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of each position.
Imagine you are a citizen on this planet. Write a diary entry from the perspective of someone living through this crisis. Describe your thoughts and feelings about the potential loss of creativity and memory or the risk of extinction. Share your entry with the class and discuss the emotional impact of each choice.
Research real-world ethical dilemmas related to resource scarcity and technological advancements. Prepare a short presentation on one such dilemma, comparing it to the Nuronium vs. Polixate scenario. Highlight the ethical considerations and potential consequences of each decision.
Assume the roles of different stakeholders in the society, such as scientists, artists, and government officials. Conduct a mock council meeting where each role presents their viewpoint on the decision. Discuss how different perspectives influence the final decision-making process.
Engage in a philosophical discussion about what makes life worth living. Consider the importance of culture, creativity, and happiness. Reflect on how these elements contribute to the meaning of life and how they relate to the choices presented in the article.
Here’s a sanitized version of the transcript, removing any potentially sensitive or complex language while maintaining the core message:
—
On your planet, life relies heavily on a substance called Nuronium. Your species is very similar to humans, but you need Nuronium in the atmosphere for normal thinking. Without it, people struggle to imagine and reflect. Over time, they even lose the ability to form and keep long-term memories. This is a serious issue, but Nuronium also provides a clean energy source that has allowed your people to thrive for a long time.
Recently, scientists discovered concerning news: the source of Nuronium has been damaged and now releases a pollutant that affects fertility. If your planet continues to depend on Nuronium, your species could face extinction in 100 years. Fortunately, scientists have found a passing comet that contains an alternative energy source called Polixate. Polixate would not cause infertility and could provide renewable energy like Nuronium, but it would not support cognitive functions in the same way. With Polixate in the atmosphere, people would lose creativity, long-term memories, and eventually, your culture could fade away.
The comet will only be available for a few days, so your society’s leaders must decide quickly whether to continue using Nuronium or to gather Polixate. The board is currently divided and is waiting for your deciding vote.
Dr. Taylof’s group argues for continuing with Nuronium. They believe that your culture—centuries of literature, music, art, and advancements in various fields—is what gives life meaning. Without memories and the ability to create, future generations would live without purpose. Dr. Taylof believes that if future generations cannot contribute to the civilization they inherit, there is no reason to try to preserve them. They argue that no one is harmed by relying on Nuronium, and your species should accept its fate with dignity.
On the other hand, Dr. Kahan and their supporters strongly disagree. They acknowledge that switching to Polixate would lower your people’s quality of life, but they believe that as long as basic needs are met, people could still find happiness, similar to simpler life forms. Dr. Kahan emphasizes that preserving life is incredibly valuable. They believe that every member of your species contributes to the overall well-being of your people, so ensuring your species continues to exist would enhance collective happiness.
Dr. Taylof counters that a meaningful life involves more than just happiness; it includes preserving culture and traditions. They argue that merely existing, like contented pets, lacks value.
Meanwhile, supporters of Polixate argue that choosing extinction is fundamentally wrong. Dr. Kahan states that there is no moral difference between actions taken and those that could have been avoided. To knowingly choose extinction is akin to committing a grave injustice.
Both sides have more to discuss, but the council needs your vote now. What will it be: continue with Nuronium for a while, or switch to Polixate for the long term?
Ethical – Relating to moral principles or the branch of knowledge dealing with these. – In philosophy class, we debated the ethical implications of artificial intelligence in society.
Dilemma – A situation in which a difficult choice has to be made between two or more alternatives, especially ones that are equally undesirable. – The scientist faced a dilemma when deciding whether to publish the controversial research findings.
Culture – The ideas, customs, and social behavior of a particular people or society. – The study of ancient texts provides insight into the culture of early civilizations.
Happiness – The state of being happy, often considered in philosophical discussions about the purpose of life. – Philosophers have long debated whether happiness is the ultimate goal of human existence.
Memory – The faculty by which the mind stores and remembers information, often discussed in cognitive science and philosophy. – The philosopher pondered how memory shapes our personal identity over time.
Extinction – The state or process of a species, family, or larger group being or becoming extinct. – The extinction of certain species raises ethical questions about human responsibility in environmental conservation.
Energy – The strength and vitality required for sustained physical or mental activity, often discussed in the context of physics and metaphysics. – The concept of energy is central to understanding both physical phenomena and philosophical ideas about change.
Creativity – The use of imagination or original ideas to create something; inventiveness. – Creativity is often seen as a key component of scientific innovation and philosophical thought.
Decision – A conclusion or resolution reached after consideration, often analyzed in philosophy and psychology. – Making a decision about which ethical theory to follow can be challenging for students of philosophy.
Civilization – The stage of human social development and organization that is considered most advanced. – The rise and fall of ancient civilizations provide valuable lessons for modern societies.
