Ferdinand Marcos: Greed, Guns, and Gold in the Philippines

Alphabets Sounds Video

share us on:

The lesson on Ferdinand Marcos highlights his rise to power in the Philippines, marked by corruption, authoritarianism, and significant human rights abuses during his two-decade rule. Initially a democratically elected president, Marcos declared martial law to suppress dissent, leading to widespread political repression and economic decline. His eventual downfall in 1986, spurred by public protests and loss of U.S. support, serves as a cautionary tale about the perils of unchecked power and the impact of greed on governance.

Ferdinand Marcos: Greed, Guns, and Gold in the Philippines

Introduction

Ferdinand Marcos is a name that often comes up when discussing corruption in history. He ruled the Philippines for two decades, first as a democratically elected president and later as a dictator. His time in power was marked by authoritarian rule, especially during the martial law years, when thousands of political prisoners were killed or tortured. Marcos and his wife, Imelda, are infamous for stealing billions from the country, while many Filipinos struggled with poverty and inadequate healthcare.

The Rise of Ferdinand Marcos

Ferdinand Emmanuel Marcos was born on September 11, 1917, in Ilocos Norte, a region known for its tobacco farms. Despite the area’s hardships, Marcos grew up comfortably. His mother came from a wealthy family, and his father, Mariano, was a politician. In 1925, Mariano was elected to the House of Representatives, and the family moved to Manila. Marcos enjoyed a privileged upbringing, attending good schools and engaging in hobbies like boxing and shooting.

Early Challenges and Legal Acumen

In 1935, the Philippines gained more autonomy from the U.S., and Mariano aimed for a seat in the new national assembly but lost. Shortly after, the winner, Julia Nellanderson, was assassinated, and Marcos was accused of the crime. Convicted in 1939, he was sentenced to prison but continued his law studies. Representing himself in court, he won his appeal in 1940, gaining fame in Manila.

World War II and Political Ambitions

When Japan invaded the Philippines in 1941, Marcos’s wartime actions became a topic of debate. Some say he was a guerrilla hero, while others claim he profited from the black market. Regardless, he used his charisma to build a heroic image, which helped his post-war political career. In 1946, as the Philippines gained full independence, Marcos became a special assistant to the new president, boosting his political network.

Political Ascent

Marcos relaunched his career as a lawyer and entered politics in 1949, winning a seat in the lower house. By 1963, he was president of the Senate and a prominent figure in the liberal party. Unsatisfied, he switched parties and won the presidency in 1965. Initially, his rule seemed stable, but he soon began to consolidate power.

Martial Law and Dictatorship

In 1970, protests against his government led to a violent crackdown. Sensing unrest, Marcos declared martial law on September 21, 1972, arresting thousands and silencing opposition. Although martial law initially brought stability, corruption and poor management led to economic problems. By the 1980s, opposition grew stronger, especially after the assassination of Benigno Aquino Jr. in 1983, which sparked nationwide protests.

Downfall and Legacy

In 1985, under pressure, Marcos called for early elections, expecting to win. However, the opposition, led by Corazon Aquino, gained massive support. The disputed election results led to civil disobedience campaigns. By February 1986, protests had crippled the country, and Marcos’s support dwindled. With the U.S. withdrawing its backing, Marcos fled the Philippines, taking millions in stolen wealth. He died in exile in Hawaii in 1989.

Conclusion

Ferdinand Marcos’s legacy is complex. Some Filipinos remember his rule with nostalgia, while others recall the suffering and corruption. His story is a warning about the dangers of unchecked power and corruption.

  1. Reflecting on Ferdinand Marcos’s early life and upbringing, how do you think his privileged background influenced his political ambitions and actions later in life?
  2. Considering Marcos’s legal acumen and his ability to represent himself successfully in court, what does this reveal about his character and skills? How might these traits have contributed to his political rise?
  3. Discuss the impact of World War II on Marcos’s political career. How did the narratives surrounding his wartime actions shape public perception and his subsequent political trajectory?
  4. Marcos’s switch from the liberal party to another political party was a significant move in his career. What does this decision tell you about his political strategy and ambitions?
  5. Martial law under Marcos initially brought stability but eventually led to economic problems and increased opposition. How do you interpret the long-term effects of his authoritarian rule on the Philippines?
  6. Reflect on the role of international influence, particularly the United States, in the downfall of Marcos. How significant do you think external pressures were in shaping the political landscape of the Philippines during this period?
  7. Considering the complex legacy of Ferdinand Marcos, how do you think his rule is perceived differently by various groups within the Philippines today?
  8. What lessons can be learned from Marcos’s story about the dangers of unchecked power and corruption in governance? How can these lessons be applied to current political systems globally?
  1. Research and Presentation

    Research a key event during Ferdinand Marcos’s rule, such as the declaration of martial law or the assassination of Benigno Aquino Jr. Create a presentation that explains the event, its impact on the Philippines, and how it contributed to Marcos’s eventual downfall. Present your findings to the class, highlighting different perspectives on the event.

  2. Debate on Martial Law

    Participate in a class debate on the pros and cons of martial law during Marcos’s regime. Divide into two groups, with one supporting the necessity of martial law for stability and the other opposing it due to human rights abuses. Use historical evidence to support your arguments and engage in a respectful discussion.

  3. Role-Playing Activity

    Engage in a role-playing activity where you assume the roles of various historical figures from the Marcos era, such as Ferdinand Marcos, Imelda Marcos, Corazon Aquino, or a political prisoner. Discuss the challenges and motivations of your character, and how they navigated the political landscape of the time.

  4. Documentary Viewing and Reflection

    Watch a documentary about Ferdinand Marcos’s rule, focusing on his rise to power, the implementation of martial law, and his eventual downfall. After viewing, write a reflection on how the documentary’s portrayal of events aligns with or differs from the article. Discuss the role of media in shaping public perception of historical figures.

  5. Creative Writing Assignment

    Write a short story or diary entry from the perspective of a young Filipino living during the Marcos era. Describe their daily life, the challenges they face, and their hopes for the future. Use historical details to create an authentic narrative that reflects the impact of Marcos’s rule on ordinary citizens.

This video is brought to you by Policygenius. If you have family members who depend on your income, you need life insurance. That’s where Policygenius comes in. More on them in just a bit.

Ferdinand Marcos is synonymous with corruption. For 20 years, he ruled the Philippines, first as its democratically elected president and then as its iron-fisted dictator. His regime was defined by authoritarianism, particularly during the years of martial law, when it’s estimated around 3,000 political prisoners were murdered and another 40,000 were tortured. The major theme of the Marcos years was corruption on a scale rarely seen in history. Marcos and his wife, Imelda, plundered the state treasury, using public funds to buy everything from luxury villas to extravagant jewelry and thousands of pairs of designer shoes. They are thought to have stolen five billion dollars from the Philippines at a time when millions were going hungry and underfunded hospitals couldn’t afford basic supplies.

Today, we are investigating the story of how one man managed to turn an entire nation into his personal piggy bank.

Ferdinand Emmanuel Marcos was born on September 11, 1917, in Ilocos Norte, a province known for its tobacco plantations. While life for many in the area was hard, Marcos was brought up in relative comfort. His mother came from a land-owning family, and his father, Mariano, was a local politician. There have been rumors that Marcos’s godfather, a judge named Ferdinand Juan, was his real father, but regardless of his true heritage, Marcos always stood loyally by the man he called father.

In 1925, Mariano won election to the House of Representatives of the Philippines, then a part of the Insular Government. The family moved to Manila, where Marcos settled into the privileged life of a politician’s son. He attended a good school, took up hobbies like boxing and shooting, and even after Mariano lost his seat in 1932, Marcos continued studying law at the University of the Philippines. He became one of the country’s star marksmen as part of the Reserve Officer’s Training Corps.

In 1935, the U.S. altered the colony’s status, granting further autonomy and creating a new national assembly. Mariano was determined to be a part of it, but he lost the election to Julia Nellanderson. Just two days later, Nellanderson was assassinated, and Marcos was arrested for murder. He was convicted in 1939 and handed a sentence of 10 to 17 years. While in jail, he kept up his law studies and eventually represented himself in court, impressing everyone with his speaking skills and legal knowledge. The court ruled in his favor in 1940, turning him into a celebrity in Manila.

Marcos’s work in his father’s law firm lasted barely a year. On December 8, 1941, Japan invaded the Philippines, opening a new front in World War II. Marcos’s wartime exploits are viewed differently depending on who you ask. Supporters claim he was a decorated guerrilla fighter, while others argue he spent the war profiting on the black market. Regardless, he used his charisma to create a mythic reputation, which helped him in his political career after the war.

In 1946, just after the U.S. granted the Philippines full independence, Marcos became a special assistant to the new president, opening up networking opportunities. He relaunched his career as a lawyer, trading on his war hero reputation to attract big clients. In 1949, he launched his political career, running on a liberal party ticket for the lower house. He became a fixture on Manila’s political scene and married Imelda Romualdez in 1954.

By 1963, Marcos was president of the Senate and a rising star in the liberal party. However, he was not satisfied and decided to run for president. In 1965, he switched parties and won the election, becoming the head of state. Initially, his presidency did not seem like a major shift, but he soon began to consolidate power.

In 1970, protests erupted against his administration, leading to a violent crackdown. Recognizing the growing unrest, Marcos sought to implement martial law. On September 21, 1972, he declared martial law, arresting thousands and silencing dissent. Over the coming months, laws were enacted to concentrate power in his hands, and thousands were jailed or tortured.

Despite the chaos, martial law was initially popular as it brought stability. However, the regime’s corruption and mismanagement led to economic decline. By the 1980s, the opposition was growing stronger, culminating in the assassination of opposition leader Benigno Aquino Jr. in 1983. This event sparked widespread protests against Marcos’s rule.

In 1985, facing mounting pressure, Marcos called for early elections, believing he could secure a victory. However, the opposition, led by Aquino’s widow, Corazon Aquino, gained overwhelming support. The election results were widely disputed, leading to a campaign of civil disobedience.

By February 1986, protests had paralyzed the country, and Marcos’s allies began to abandon him. With U.S. support waning, Marcos was forced to flee the Philippines, taking millions in looted goods with him. He died in exile in Hawaii in 1989, facing federal charges of racketeering.

Today, Ferdinand Marcos’s legacy is complex. Some in the Philippines express nostalgia for his rule, while others remember the suffering and corruption of his regime. His story serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked power and corruption.

If you found this video interesting, please hit that thumbs up button below and don’t forget to subscribe. Thanks for watching!

MarcosReferring to Ferdinand Marcos, a former president of the Philippines known for his authoritarian rule and the declaration of martial law. – Ferdinand Marcos ruled the Philippines from 1965 to 1986, a period marked by significant political and economic changes.

PhilippinesA Southeast Asian country consisting of an archipelago in the Pacific Ocean, known for its diverse culture and history of colonial rule. – The Philippines gained independence from the United States on July 4, 1946, after being a colony for nearly half a century.

CorruptionThe abuse of entrusted power for private gain, often seen in government and politics. – During the Marcos regime, corruption was rampant, leading to widespread poverty and social unrest in the Philippines.

MartialRelating to war or military operations, often used in the context of martial law, which involves the suspension of ordinary law. – The declaration of martial law in 1972 allowed Ferdinand Marcos to extend his rule by suppressing political opposition.

LawA system of rules created and enforced through social or governmental institutions to regulate behavior. – The implementation of martial law in the Philippines led to the suspension of civil rights and the arrest of political dissidents.

DictatorshipA form of government where a single person or a small group possesses absolute power without effective constitutional limitations. – Under Marcos’s dictatorship, the Philippines experienced severe restrictions on freedom of speech and the press.

PoliticsThe activities associated with the governance of a country or area, especially the debate between parties having power. – The politics of the Philippines during the Marcos era were characterized by a lack of democratic processes and widespread corruption.

ElectionsA formal and organized process of electing or being elected, especially of members of a political body. – The 1986 snap elections in the Philippines were marred by allegations of fraud, leading to the People Power Revolution.

ProtestsA statement or action expressing disapproval of or objection to something, often in a public demonstration. – The People Power Revolution was a series of protests in the Philippines that led to the ousting of Ferdinand Marcos.

LegacySomething transmitted by or received from an ancestor or predecessor, often referring to the lasting impact of a leader or government. – The legacy of Ferdinand Marcos’s rule is still debated in the Philippines, with discussions focusing on both economic development and human rights abuses.

All Video Lessons

Login your account

Please login your account to get started.

Don't have an account?

Register your account

Please sign up your account to get started.

Already have an account?