How one design flaw almost toppled a skyscraper – Alex Gendler

Alphabets Sounds Video

share us on:

In 1978, architecture student Diane Hartley discovered a critical flaw in the design of the Citicorp Center, a skyscraper in Manhattan, which could have led to its collapse during strong winds. Her findings revealed that a change in construction materials had compromised the building’s structural integrity, prompting chief engineer William LeMessurier to secretly reinforce the structure without public knowledge. This covert operation, completed just before a potential hurricane, ultimately averted a disaster, highlighting the importance of thorough oversight in architectural engineering.

The Hidden Flaw in Citicorp Center: A Near-Disaster Averted

In 1978, Diane Hartley, an undergraduate architecture student, made a startling discovery while working on her thesis. Her research focused on the Citicorp Center, a towering skyscraper in midtown Manhattan. As she meticulously examined the building’s plans, she uncovered a potentially catastrophic oversight that threatened to bring down the 59-story structure in one of New York City’s most densely populated areas.

Citicorp Center: A Unique Architectural Marvel

Completed in 1977, the Citicorp Center was among the world’s tallest buildings at the time. Its sloped roof was a distinctive feature in the city skyline, but the building’s most remarkable aspect lay at its base. The construction site was already occupied by St. Peter’s Lutheran Church, necessitating the skyscraper to be built on columns, akin to stilts. While using stilts on a building’s corners was not unprecedented, the church’s location at the block’s corner required these supports to be placed at the center of each side.

Despite concerns from some backers, chief structural engineer William LeMessurier took extensive measures to ensure the building’s stability. The exterior was designed with v-shaped chevrons, forming a robust exoskeleton to support the skyscraper. This design not only provided strength but also reduced the building’s overall weight. However, it left the structure susceptible to strong winds, a challenge LeMessurier addressed with a state-of-the-art solution—a tuned mass damper. This 400-ton counterweight, controlled by computerized sensors, was designed to counteract any swaying.

A Critical Oversight Uncovered

With these safety measures in place, calculations indicated that each side of the building could withstand powerful winds, and the Citicorp Center opened for business in 1977. However, a year later, Hartley noticed an anomaly during her study. While the building’s broad sides were designed to endure strong winds, the unique base meant that winds striking the corners posed a greater threat. Traditional designs did not account for corner winds, leading Hartley to suspect that this risk had been overlooked.

Upon contacting LeMessurier’s firm, Hartley was initially reassured that the building could handle these winds. However, upon reviewing the plans, LeMessurier identified a critical issue. A change, made without his knowledge, had replaced the exoskeleton’s welded joints with cheaper, weaker bolted joints. Although the mass damper mitigated this risk, a power outage during a storm could deactivate the counterweight’s sensors, leaving the building vulnerable to winds of just 112 kilometers per hour. Given the weather data, such a storm had a one-in-sixteen chance of hitting New York City annually.

The Secret Reinforcement Mission

LeMessurier never informed Hartley of her discovery’s significance. Instead, he discreetly informed the architects and Citicorp executives, and together with city officials, devised a confidential plan. Without alerting the public, construction crews embarked on night-time shifts to reinforce the bolted joints. This delicate operation began in mid-August 1978 and was only halfway complete when Hurricane Ella threatened the city in September. City officials and Citicorp executives prepared an emergency evacuation for a 10-block radius, but the hurricane ultimately veered out to sea, sparing the city.

The secret evacuation plans were never executed, and the reinforcements were completed a month later. Remarkably, this covert construction went unnoticed due to a newspaper strike that coincided with the project. The public remained unaware of the near-disaster until 1995, when a New Yorker article unveiled the story to the city and to Diane Hartley. Although the article, like LeMessurier, failed to credit Hartley, she at least knew that her diligent work had saved countless lives.

  1. What aspects of Diane Hartley’s discovery about the Citicorp Center do you find most surprising or impressive, and why?
  2. Reflecting on the role of William LeMessurier, how do you think his response to the oversight reflects on his professional ethics and responsibilities?
  3. How might the Citicorp Center incident influence your perspective on the importance of thoroughness and attention to detail in professional work?
  4. What lessons can be drawn from the way the potential disaster was handled, particularly in terms of communication and crisis management?
  5. In what ways do you think the secrecy surrounding the reinforcement mission was justified or unjustified, and what might have been the consequences of a more transparent approach?
  6. How does the story of the Citicorp Center challenge or reinforce your views on the relationship between innovation and risk in engineering and architecture?
  7. Considering the eventual public revelation of the near-disaster, how important do you think it is for such stories to be shared, and what impact might they have on public trust and industry standards?
  8. Reflect on a time when you discovered an oversight or error in your work or studies. How did you address it, and what did you learn from the experience?
  1. Activity 1: Model Building Challenge

    Construct a scale model of the Citicorp Center using materials like cardboard, straws, and glue. Pay special attention to the unique base design and the placement of the columns. This hands-on activity will help you understand the architectural challenges and solutions implemented in the building.

  2. Activity 2: Wind Simulation Experiment

    Create a wind tunnel using a fan and a small-scale model of the Citicorp Center. Test how the building reacts to winds from different directions, especially the corners. Document your observations and compare them with the issues Diane Hartley discovered.

  3. Activity 3: Research and Presentation

    Research another famous building that faced structural challenges and present your findings to the class. Highlight the problem, the solution, and any lessons learned. This will help you appreciate the complexities of architectural engineering and the importance of thorough analysis.

  4. Activity 4: Debate on Ethical Engineering

    Participate in a classroom debate on the ethical responsibilities of engineers and architects. Discuss whether LeMessurier and the Citicorp executives handled the situation appropriately. Consider the implications of keeping the reinforcement mission secret from the public.

  5. Activity 5: Creative Writing Assignment

    Write a short story or essay from the perspective of Diane Hartley, detailing her discovery and the potential consequences if the flaw had not been addressed. This activity will help you explore the human element in engineering and the impact of individual contributions.

EngineeringThe application of scientific and mathematical principles to create structures, machines, and systems that solve problems. – Engineering plays a crucial role in developing sustainable energy solutions for the future.

ArchitectureThe art and science of designing buildings and other physical structures. – The architecture of the new library combines modern aesthetics with functional spaces for community use.

SkyscraperA tall, continuously habitable building with multiple floors, typically designed for commercial or residential use. – The skyline of the city is dominated by a stunning skyscraper that reaches over 100 stories high.

StabilityThe ability of a structure to maintain its position and resist external forces without collapsing. – Engineers must ensure the stability of bridges to withstand heavy traffic and environmental conditions.

WindsThe movement of air that can exert pressure on structures, affecting their design and stability. – Architects consider the effects of strong winds when designing tall buildings to ensure they can withstand gusts.

JointsThe points at which two or more structural elements are connected, allowing for movement and flexibility. – Properly designed joints are essential in construction to accommodate thermal expansion and contraction.

ConstructionThe process of building or assembling infrastructure, including roads, bridges, and buildings. – The construction of the new sports complex is expected to be completed by the end of the year.

DesignThe process of creating a plan or drawing that outlines the specifications and aesthetics of a structure. – The design of the new community center incorporates eco-friendly materials and energy-efficient systems.

SafetyThe condition of being protected from or unlikely to cause danger, risk, or injury in engineering and construction. – Safety protocols are critical on construction sites to prevent accidents and ensure worker well-being.

DisasterAn event that causes significant damage or destruction, often requiring engineering solutions for recovery and rebuilding. – After the earthquake, engineers were called in to assess the damage and develop a plan for disaster recovery.

All Video Lessons

Login your account

Please login your account to get started.

Don't have an account?

Register your account

Please sign up your account to get started.

Already have an account?