ClassX Video Lessons Youtube Channel SmarterEveryDay I Was SCARED To Say This To NASA… (But I said it anyway) – Smarter Every Day 293
Greetings! I’m a PhD student at The University of Alabama in Huntsville, working under the guidance of Dr. Jason Cassibry. Recently, I had the incredible opportunity to speak at the 2023 von Braun Space Exploration Symposium, organized by the American Astronautical Society. This event is a gathering of industry leaders, students, and government officials, all focused on the future of space exploration.
Initially, I was hesitant to accept the invitation. I like to be thoroughly prepared for any talk I give. However, I realized that this was a chance to speak to some of the most influential figures in the aerospace industry, including those involved in the Artemis program, which aims to return humans to the moon using cutting-edge technology.
My goal was to offer an external perspective on the Artemis program. During my research, I noticed some communication issues, especially concerning the program’s architecture, which many seemed reluctant to discuss. Despite warnings from respected colleagues about potential repercussions for my relationship with NASA, I decided to address these concerns openly.
As I prepared for the talk, I felt a mix of nervousness and excitement. I wanted to establish my credibility in the aerospace field by sharing my experiences and background. I began my presentation by discussing my journey and the influences that shaped my understanding of aerospace engineering.
I shared stories from my upbringing, including my grandfather’s work at the Army Ballistic Missile Agency and my father’s contributions to the James Webb Space Telescope. I also talked about my professional experiences, including internships and projects related to aerospace systems.
During my talk, I emphasized the critical role of effective communication and the necessity of both positive and negative feedback in engineering. I highlighted the challenges faced by the Artemis program, particularly regarding its mission architecture and the complexities of the Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO) being utilized.
I urged the audience to reflect on the lessons learned from the Apollo program and to prioritize simplicity and redundancy in their designs. I stressed the importance of maintaining open lines of communication and being willing to ask difficult questions.
In conclusion, I encouraged everyone to view the mission from a different perspective, to be thinkers and doers, and to take action in their respective roles. I expressed my gratitude for the opportunity to speak and for the support from the audience.
Thank you for your time, and I hope you found my insights valuable.
Space exploration is a field that requires not only technical expertise but also the courage to challenge existing paradigms. The Artemis program, like any ambitious project, faces hurdles that can be overcome through collaboration and innovation. By fostering an environment where open dialogue is encouraged, we can ensure that the future of space exploration is both successful and sustainable.
As we look to the stars, it’s crucial to remember the lessons of the past while embracing the possibilities of the future. Whether you’re a student, a professional, or an enthusiast, your contributions to the conversation about space exploration are invaluable. Let’s continue to push the boundaries of what’s possible, together.
Imagine you are attending the von Braun Space Exploration Symposium. Prepare a short presentation on a topic related to the Artemis program, focusing on communication challenges or mission architecture. Present your ideas to a small group of classmates, simulating a symposium environment. This will help you practice public speaking and engage in constructive feedback.
Participate in a workshop where you analyze case studies of successful and unsuccessful communication in aerospace projects. Discuss with peers how effective communication can impact project outcomes. This activity will enhance your understanding of the importance of clear communication in engineering and project management.
Work in teams to design a simple mission architecture for a hypothetical lunar mission. Focus on incorporating simplicity and redundancy, as emphasized in the article. Present your design to the class, explaining your choices and how they address potential challenges. This will reinforce the concepts of mission planning and engineering design.
Write a reflective essay on the role of feedback in engineering, drawing parallels between the lessons from the Apollo program and the current challenges faced by the Artemis program. Share your essay with a peer for feedback. This activity will help you articulate your thoughts and understand the value of constructive criticism.
Engage in a debate on whether current space exploration efforts should prioritize innovation over traditional methods. Use examples from the Artemis program and other historical missions to support your arguments. This will encourage critical thinking and allow you to explore different perspectives on space exploration.
Sure! Here’s a sanitized version of the YouTube transcript, removing any personal identifiers, informal language, and extraneous details while maintaining the core message:
—
Hello, I am a PhD student at The University of Alabama in Huntsville, studying under Dr. Jason Cassibry. Recently, I was invited to speak at the 2023 von Braun Space Exploration Symposium, hosted by the American Astronautical Society. This symposium brings together industry leaders, students, and government officials to discuss the future of space exploration.
Initially, I was hesitant to accept the invitation, as I prefer to prepare thoroughly for talks. However, I realized that the audience would consist of influential figures in the aerospace industry, involved in significant projects like the Artemis program, which aims to return humans to the moon using new technology.
In my talk, I aimed to provide an external perspective on the Artemis program. As I researched, I discovered some communication issues surrounding it, particularly regarding the architecture of the program that people were reluctant to discuss. I decided to address these concerns openly, despite warnings from respected colleagues about potential repercussions for my relationship with NASA.
As I prepared for the talk, I felt nervous but also excited to share my insights. I wanted to establish my credibility in the aerospace field, highlighting my experiences and background. The first part of my presentation focused on my journey and the influences that shaped my understanding of aerospace engineering.
I shared anecdotes from my upbringing, including my grandfather’s work at the Army Ballistic Missile Agency and my father’s contributions to the James Webb Space Telescope. I also discussed my professional experiences, including internships and projects related to aerospace systems.
During my talk, I emphasized the importance of effective communication and the need for both positive and negative feedback in engineering. I highlighted the challenges faced by the Artemis program, particularly regarding its mission architecture and the complexities of the Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO) being utilized.
I urged the audience to reflect on the lessons learned from the Apollo program and to prioritize simplicity and redundancy in their designs. I stressed the importance of maintaining open lines of communication and being willing to ask difficult questions.
In conclusion, I encouraged everyone to look at the mission differently, to be thinkers and doers, and to take action in their respective roles. I expressed my gratitude for the opportunity to speak and for the support from the audience.
Thank you for your time, and I hope you found my insights valuable.
—
This version maintains the essence of the original talk while removing informalities and personal anecdotes that may not be relevant to the core message.
Engineering – The application of scientific and mathematical principles to design and build structures, machines, and systems. – Engineering students often work on projects that require them to design a bridge using principles of physics and material science.
Physics – The natural science that studies matter, its motion, and behavior through space and time, and the related entities of energy and force. – Understanding the laws of physics is crucial for engineers to create efficient and safe mechanical systems.
Communication – The process of exchanging information, ideas, or instructions, especially in a technical context. – Effective communication between team members is essential for the successful completion of engineering projects.
Exploration – The act of investigating or studying something in detail to discover more about it, often used in the context of scientific research. – The exploration of new materials can lead to significant advancements in engineering and technology.
Technology – The application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry. – Advances in technology have revolutionized the way engineers approach problem-solving in various fields.
Architecture – The art and science of designing and constructing buildings and other physical structures. – Modern architecture often incorporates sustainable engineering practices to minimize environmental impact.
Aerospace – The branch of technology and industry concerned with both aviation and space flight. – Aerospace engineering involves the design and development of aircraft and spacecraft, requiring a deep understanding of aerodynamics and propulsion systems.
Innovation – The introduction of new ideas, methods, or products to improve processes or solve problems. – Innovation in renewable energy technologies is critical for reducing the carbon footprint of industrial activities.
Collaboration – The action of working with others to achieve a common goal, often seen in multidisciplinary engineering projects. – Collaboration between mechanical and electrical engineers is essential for developing complex robotic systems.
Simplicity – The quality of being easy to understand or use, often a key principle in engineering design. – In engineering, simplicity in design can lead to more reliable and maintainable systems.
