From March 1969 to October 2003, the Concorde offered supersonic passenger travel, dramatically reducing the flight time between New York and London to just three hours. Despite advancements in aviation technology, today’s flights on the same route take longer than during the Concorde era. This raises the question: could the future of spaceflight, particularly with SpaceX’s Starship, bring about a revolutionary change similar to what Concorde achieved?
The Concorde’s downfall was primarily due to financial reasons, although the situation was more nuanced. Over the years, the demand for fuel efficiency in airplanes increased, especially during the 2000s when jet fuel prices soared. Engineers discovered that larger engines could improve efficiency by allowing more air to bypass the combustion section, thus generating thrust with less fuel. In contrast, Concorde’s turbojet engines relied heavily on burning fuel, making them less efficient by today’s standards. Modern airplanes have significantly reduced emissions compared to Concorde, which would be considered a fuel guzzler today.
While larger engines have improved fuel efficiency, they also limit flight speeds. Excessive airflow through these engines can act like a barrier, slowing the plane and increasing fuel consumption. Therefore, manufacturers recommend an optimal cruising speed between 880 and 925 km/h, which is slower than the speeds of passenger jets in the 1960s. This focus on efficiency and cost savings makes Concorde’s high operating costs impractical today.
Starship, with its capacity to carry eight times more passengers than Concorde, presents a promising alternative. Despite its high running costs, the average ticket price could be around $1,200, making it more accessible than Concorde’s fares. However, it’s uncertain how Starship will compete with traditional airplanes, as modern passengers are less inclined to pay extra for faster travel due to the convenience of virtual meetings and in-flight entertainment.
For any aircraft or rocket, the goal is to recoup its purchase cost and eventually turn a profit. This typically happens 5 to 10 years after purchase for airplanes, which can operate for many years beyond that. The lifespan of an aircraft is determined by the number of pressure cycles it undergoes, with each takeoff stressing the fuselage and wings. Concorde averaged around 5,000 flights, while an Airbus A380 can make about 35,000 flights before retirement.
Starship is designed for hundreds of flights before needing refurbishment, although the exact number of cycles it can handle is still unknown. However, its production cost is significantly lower than Concorde’s, potentially allowing it to break even much sooner.
While the idea of rockets replacing airliners remains a dream, it’s important to remember that similar skepticism surrounded airplanes in the early 20th century. With advancements in technology and funding, air travel has become one of the safest and most efficient forms of transportation. Whether Starship will revolutionize Earth travel is uncertain, but its development is an exciting chapter in aviation history.
Skillshare is an online learning community offering thousands of classes to inspire creativity and curiosity. With expert instructors, you can explore topics ranging from photography to business and entrepreneurship. If you’re interested in documenting spaceflight or showcasing your skills, consider the class ‘YouTube Success’ by Marques Brownlee. Skillshare offers a 1-month free trial for the first 1,000 sign-ups, providing an ad-free learning experience with new premium classes regularly added. Support the channel further by becoming a Patron for exclusive access to our Discord server and input on future videos. Thank you for engaging with this content, and stay tuned for more exciting developments!
Investigate the history and technology behind supersonic travel, focusing on Concorde and its impact on aviation. Prepare a presentation that compares Concorde with SpaceX’s Starship, highlighting their technological advancements and challenges. Present your findings to the class, emphasizing the potential future of supersonic and space travel.
Participate in a debate on the topic of efficiency versus speed in modern aviation. Form teams to argue either for prioritizing fuel efficiency and cost savings or for investing in faster travel solutions like Starship. Use data and examples from the article to support your arguments, and engage in a lively discussion with your peers.
Conduct a case study analysis of the economic challenges faced by Concorde. Examine the factors that led to its financial downfall, such as fuel costs and operating expenses. Discuss how these challenges compare to those faced by modern aerospace projects like Starship, and propose potential solutions for overcoming similar obstacles.
Work in groups to design a conceptual model of a sustainable supersonic aircraft. Consider factors such as fuel efficiency, environmental impact, and passenger capacity. Present your design to the class, explaining how it addresses the limitations of past supersonic aircraft and how it could be a viable option for future travel.
Take a virtual tour of SpaceX’s facilities to learn about the development of Starship. Document your observations and insights in a report, focusing on the engineering and innovation involved in creating a spacecraft capable of revolutionizing travel. Share your report with the class, highlighting the potential impact of Starship on the future of transportation.
This video is supported by Skillshare. From March 1969 until October 2003, we had supersonic passenger travel with Concorde, allowing us to travel from New York to London in just 3 hours—a journey that previously took much longer. Fast forward to now, and airplanes are much safer, more efficient, and cheaper. However, the flight time from New York to London is now slower than it was before Concorde’s introduction. After 50 years of aircraft development, how did we end up slower? Could the future of spaceflight provide the next significant leap in technology, similar to what Concorde achieved?
To understand this, we need to explore why Concorde ultimately failed and why faster airplanes aren’t necessarily better. The straightforward answer is money, but the situation is more complex. The fuel efficiency of airplanes has improved significantly over time, largely due to the demand for increased efficiency, which peaked in the 2000s when the price of jet fuel rose dramatically.
Engineers sought new ways to enhance fuel efficiency, discovering that increasing engine size could greatly improve efficiency. Air can take two paths through a jet engine: some passes through the center, where it is compressed and ignited by jet fuel, creating thrust and powering the fan. The rest bypasses this section and is expelled out the back, also generating thrust. In the past, engines relied heavily on the jet section for thrust, but engineers found that larger fans and bypassing more air allowed for greater thrust with less fuel, thus improving efficiency.
In contrast, Concorde utilized turbojet engines that derived most of their thrust from burning fuel, making them less efficient than modern engines. As manufacturers continue to reduce emissions, Concorde’s reputation as a fuel guzzler would not be well-received today. A long-haul Starship flight would produce around 700 tonnes of CO2, approximately 0.8 tonnes per passenger, which is comparable to a 747. However, Concorde’s CO2 output would be around six times higher per flight. Thanks to newer, more efficient engines, modern airplanes have significantly lower emissions than Concorde.
However, these larger engines have a limitation that affects flight times. If too much air flows through them, the fan can act like a wall, slowing the plane down and requiring more fuel. This is why manufacturers recommend an optimal cruising speed between 880 and 925 km/h, where engines are most efficient. In contrast, passenger jets in the 60s typically flew closer to 1,000 km/h. Flying at these slower speeds saves airlines substantial amounts of money; for instance, JetBlue saved $13.5 million in a single year by adding just 2 minutes to their flight times. With modern airplanes focused on efficiency and cost savings, Concorde’s extreme running cost of $10,000 per return trip became increasingly impractical.
Starship’s running costs will also be high, but it can carry around eight times more passengers than Concorde. With an estimated running cost of just over $1 million per Earth flight, the average ticket price would be around $1,200, a significant improvement over Concorde’s prices and making it accessible to more people. However, even with these prices, it’s uncertain how Starship could compete with traditional airplanes. Today’s passengers are less likely to pay more for a quicker flight, as business meetings can be conducted from anywhere, and in-flight entertainment is readily available on personal devices—luxuries that weren’t possible during Concorde’s era. Nonetheless, Starship might be a preferred option if ticket prices align with business class fares.
The goal for any aircraft or rocket is to eventually recoup its purchase cost and break even. For typical aircraft, this usually occurs 5 to 10 years after purchase, with planes expected to operate for many years beyond that to generate profit. However, an aircraft’s age is determined not just by years but also by the number of pressure cycles it undergoes. Each takeoff requires pressurizing the cabin, which stresses the fuselage and wings, leading to cracks over time. Once an aircraft reaches its maximum number of cycles, it must either be scrapped or undergo costly maintenance. An Airbus A380 typically has a lifespan of around 27 years and can make about 35,000 flights before retirement, while Concorde averaged around 5,000 flights.
The same aging process applies to rockets. Starship is designed for hundreds of flights before refurbishment, but the exact number of cycles it can handle remains uncertain. While it may not reach the flight numbers of an airplane, it has a distinct advantage over Concorde and typical aircraft. The production cost for each Concorde was around $200 million, whereas a fully operational Starship stack could cost as low as $40 million. Rockets are generally simpler to manufacture than airplanes, with most of the cost attributed to the engines. If SpaceX can achieve its cost target for Starship, it may break even much sooner than Concorde ever could.
In many ways, Starship seems poised to avoid the pitfalls that led to Concorde’s demise. While the idea of rockets replacing airliners is still a dream, it’s worth noting that similar sentiments were expressed about airplanes in the early 20th century. At that time, the only existing airplanes were rudimentary, built by ambitious engineers. Once funding became available, technology advanced rapidly, leading to more sophisticated engines and larger planes capable of carrying more passengers and cargo.
Today, air travel is one of the safest forms of transportation, with airplanes capable of flying 9,000 miles while carrying 850 passengers at a time. We have indeed come a long way! While it remains uncertain whether Starship will revolutionize travel on Earth, it’s exciting to witness such significant historical developments. For Starship to fulfill its potential, it will require a skilled team of engineers and technicians, much like the team that built Concorde.
Skillshare is an online learning community offering thousands of inspiring classes designed to nurture creativity and curiosity. With top-notch instructors, you can learn about various topics, from photography to music production, and even business and entrepreneurship. Many people are starting their own YouTube channels to share their passions. If you’re interested in documenting the future of spaceflight or showcasing your unique skills, check out the class ‘YouTube Success’ by Marques Brownlee. Whether you’re experienced or just starting, this class covers everything from content creation to strategies for growing your channel. With thousands of classes available on Skillshare, find the one that suits you and start learning! Skillshare has no ads, and new premium classes are constantly being launched. The first 1,000 people to sign up using the link below will receive a 1-month free trial of Skillshare premium. If you’d like to support the channel further, consider becoming a Patron for exclusive access to our Discord server and input on each video. Thank you for watching, and I’ll see you in the next video!
Starship – A spacecraft designed for interstellar travel, often used in the context of advanced engineering and physics to explore propulsion systems and materials suitable for long-duration space missions. – The engineering team is developing a new propulsion system for the starship to ensure it can reach distant galaxies efficiently.
Concorde – A turbojet-powered supersonic passenger airliner that was a marvel of aerospace engineering, known for its speed and technological advancements. – The Concorde was an engineering feat that demonstrated the potential of supersonic travel, reducing transatlantic flight times significantly.
Efficiency – The ratio of useful output to total input in any system, often used in engineering to measure how well energy or resources are utilized. – Improving the thermal efficiency of engines is crucial for reducing fuel consumption and emissions in modern aircraft.
Engines – Machines designed to convert energy into mechanical work, playing a critical role in powering vehicles, aircraft, and other machinery. – The development of more efficient jet engines has been a key focus in reducing the environmental impact of air travel.
Fuel – A substance that is burned or otherwise consumed to produce energy, essential for powering engines and other machinery in engineering applications. – Engineers are researching alternative fuels to decrease the carbon footprint of aviation.
Emissions – Substances released into the atmosphere as a byproduct of combustion or other processes, often a focus in engineering to minimize environmental impact. – Reducing carbon emissions from aircraft engines is a major goal for sustainable aviation technology.
Speed – The rate at which an object covers distance, a critical factor in the design and performance of vehicles and aircraft. – The speed of the new high-speed train is achieved through advanced aerodynamic engineering and lightweight materials.
Aircraft – A vehicle capable of atmospheric flight due to its interaction with the air, such as airplanes and helicopters, requiring complex engineering for design and operation. – The design of the new aircraft incorporates cutting-edge materials to enhance performance and fuel efficiency.
Technology – The application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, especially in industry, encompassing tools, machines, and systems used in engineering. – Advances in materials technology have led to the development of lighter and stronger components for aerospace engineering.
Travel – The movement of people or goods from one place to another, often facilitated by engineering innovations in transportation systems. – The future of travel may include hyperloop systems, which promise to revolutionize the speed and efficiency of long-distance journeys.
