Imagine a brilliant neuroscientist named Mary. She lives in a world devoid of color, confined to a black and white room. Her books and screens are all monochrome. Despite this, Mary is an expert on color vision. She knows everything there is to know about the physics and biology of how we perceive color. She understands how different wavelengths of light interact with the three types of cone cells in our retinas and how these interactions send electrical signals through the optic nerve to the brain. These signals create patterns of neural activity that allow most humans to distinguish millions of colors.
Now, picture this: one day, Mary’s black and white screen malfunctions, and she sees a red apple in color for the first time. This is something she has studied extensively but never experienced. The question arises: does Mary learn something new from this experience? Is there an aspect of perceiving color that her extensive knowledge didn’t cover? This scenario is part of a thought experiment proposed by philosopher Frank Jackson in 1982, known as “Mary’s Room.” Jackson argued that if Mary, who knows all the physical facts about color vision, learns something new by experiencing color, then mental states like color perception cannot be fully explained by physical facts alone.
The Mary’s Room thought experiment highlights what philosophers call the knowledge argument. This argument suggests that there are non-physical properties and knowledge that can only be discovered through conscious experience. It challenges the theory of physicalism, which claims that everything, including mental states, can be explained physically. To many, it seems obvious that seeing color is fundamentally different from merely understanding it theoretically. Thus, there must be an aspect of color vision that goes beyond its physical description.
The knowledge argument isn’t limited to color vision. Mary’s Room uses color vision as a metaphor for conscious experience. If physical science can’t fully explain color vision, it might not fully explain other conscious experiences either. For instance, we might know every detail about someone else’s brain structure and function, yet still not grasp what it’s like to be that person. These unique experiences are known as qualia—subjective qualities that can’t be accurately described or measured. Qualia are personal, like feeling an itch, being in love, or experiencing boredom. Physical facts alone can’t fully explain these mental states.
Philosophers interested in artificial intelligence have used the knowledge argument to suggest that replicating a physical state doesn’t necessarily recreate a corresponding mental state. In other words, even if we build a computer that mimics every neuron in the human brain, it might not achieve consciousness.
Not all philosophers agree on the usefulness of the Mary’s Room experiment. Some argue that Mary’s extensive knowledge of color vision would allow her to mentally simulate the experience of seeing color, meaning the screen malfunction wouldn’t reveal anything new. Others believe her knowledge was incomplete because it was based solely on physical facts that can be described in words.
Interestingly, years after proposing the thought experiment, Jackson changed his stance. He concluded that Mary’s experience of seeing red corresponds to a measurable physical event in the brain, rather than unknowable qualia beyond physical explanation. However, the question of whether Mary learns something new when she sees the apple remains unresolved. Could it be that there are fundamental limits to what we can know about experiences we haven’t had? Does this imply that certain aspects of the universe are permanently beyond our comprehension? Or will science and philosophy eventually help us overcome these limitations?
This thought experiment continues to provoke discussion and debate, encouraging us to explore the boundaries of knowledge and the nature of conscious experience.
Engage in a virtual reality simulation that mimics Mary’s experience of seeing color for the first time. Reflect on how this experience compares to your theoretical understanding of color perception. Discuss in groups whether the simulation provided new insights beyond your prior knowledge.
Participate in a structured debate where you argue either for or against the knowledge argument’s challenge to physicalism. Prepare by researching both sides, and present your arguments to the class. Consider how Mary’s Room influences your stance on the nature of consciousness.
Keep a journal for a week, documenting your personal experiences of qualia, such as emotions or sensory perceptions. Analyze whether these experiences can be fully explained by physical facts. Share your findings in a class discussion, exploring the limits of scientific explanation.
Attend a workshop on artificial intelligence and consciousness. Explore how the knowledge argument applies to AI development. Work in teams to design a hypothetical AI system that could potentially experience qualia, and present your design to the class.
Write an essay reflecting on the implications of Mary’s Room for understanding human consciousness. Consider whether you agree with Jackson’s revised stance or maintain that there are aspects of experience beyond physical explanation. Use examples from your own experiences to support your argument.
Here’s a sanitized version of the provided transcript:
—
Imagine a brilliant neuroscientist named Mary. Mary lives in a black and white room; she only reads black and white books, and her screens only display black and white. Despite never having seen color, Mary is an expert in color vision and knows everything that has been discovered about its physics and biology. She understands how different wavelengths of light stimulate three types of cone cells in the retina and how electrical signals travel down the optic nerve into the brain. These signals create patterns of neural activity that correspond to the millions of colors most humans can distinguish.
Now, imagine that one day, Mary’s black and white screen malfunctions, and an apple appears in color. For the first time, she can experience something she has known about for years. Does she learn anything new? Is there anything about perceiving color that wasn’t captured in all her knowledge? Philosopher Frank Jackson proposed this thought experiment, called “Mary’s Room,” in 1982. He argued that if Mary already knew all the physical facts about color vision, and experiencing color still teaches her something new, then mental states, like color perception, cannot be completely described by physical facts.
The Mary’s Room thought experiment illustrates what philosophers call the knowledge argument, which posits that there are non-physical properties and knowledge that can only be discovered through conscious experience. This argument challenges the theory of physicalism, which asserts that everything, including mental states, has a physical explanation. To many people hearing Mary’s story, it seems intuitively obvious that actually seeing color is fundamentally different from merely learning about it. Therefore, there must be some quality of color vision that transcends its physical description.
The knowledge argument is not limited to color vision. Mary’s Room uses color vision to represent conscious experience. If physical science cannot fully explain color vision, then perhaps it cannot fully explain other conscious experiences either. For example, we could know every physical detail about the structure and function of someone else’s brain but still not understand what it feels like to be that person. These unique experiences have properties called qualia, which are subjective qualities that cannot be accurately described or measured. Qualia are specific to the individual experiencing them, such as having an itch, being in love, or feeling bored. Physical facts cannot completely explain mental states like these.
Philosophers interested in artificial intelligence have used the knowledge argument to theorize that recreating a physical state will not necessarily recreate a corresponding mental state. In other words, building a computer that mimics the function of every single neuron in the human brain may not necessarily create a conscious computerized brain.
Not all philosophers agree that the Mary’s Room experiment is useful. Some argue that her extensive knowledge of color vision would have allowed her to create the same mental state produced by actually seeing the color, meaning the screen malfunction would not show her anything new. Others contend that her knowledge was never complete in the first place because it was based only on those physical facts that can be conveyed in words.
Years after proposing it, Jackson actually reversed his stance on his thought experiment. He concluded that even Mary’s experience of seeing red corresponds to a measurable physical event in the brain, not unknowable qualia beyond physical explanation. However, there still isn’t a definitive answer to the question of whether Mary would learn anything new when she sees the apple. Could it be that there are fundamental limits to what we can know about something we cannot experience? Would this imply that certain aspects of the universe lie permanently beyond our comprehension? Or will science and philosophy enable us to overcome our mind’s limitations?
—
This version maintains the core ideas while ensuring clarity and coherence.
Philosophy – The study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence, especially when considered as an academic discipline. – In her philosophy class, Maria explored the ethical implications of artificial intelligence.
Biology – The scientific study of life and living organisms, including their structure, function, growth, evolution, and distribution. – The biology lecture today focused on the evolutionary adaptations of marine mammals.
Knowledge – Information, understanding, or skill that one gets from experience or education. – The philosopher argued that true knowledge must be justified, true belief.
Experience – The process of gaining knowledge or skill through direct involvement in or exposure to events. – The biologist emphasized that fieldwork provides invaluable experience that cannot be replicated in a laboratory.
Color – The property possessed by an object of producing different sensations on the eye as a result of the way it reflects or emits light. – The philosopher discussed how the perception of color might differ between individuals, raising questions about subjective experience.
Vision – The faculty or state of being able to see; the ability to think about or plan the future with imagination or wisdom. – In studying vision, the biology students learned about the complex processes that allow humans to perceive the world around them.
Qualia – The internal and subjective component of sense perceptions, arising from stimulation of the senses by phenomena. – The debate on whether qualia can be fully explained by physical processes remains a central issue in the philosophy of mind.
Consciousness – The state of being aware of and able to think about one’s own existence, sensations, thoughts, and surroundings. – The seminar on consciousness explored various theories about how subjective experiences arise from neural activity.
Physicalism – The doctrine that the real world consists simply of the physical world. – Physicalism posits that all mental states and properties will eventually be explained by physical processes and phenomena.
Neurons – Specialized cells transmitting nerve impulses; a nerve cell. – The biology professor explained how neurons communicate through synapses to process information in the brain.
