Plato’s Allegory Of The Ring
Chat With Your XTutor About This Video Lesson
Lesson Article
The Enigmatic Ring of Gyges: A Tale of Power and Morality
Imagine a ring that grants its wearer the power of invisibility, a supernatural ability that tempts its beholder with limitless power. This isn’t a tale from a fantasy novel featuring hobbits, dwarves, or Valkyries. Instead, it’s a story that predates them by over 2,000 years, originating from the philosophical dialogues of Plato’s “Republic”.
Plato’s Philosophical Debate: Justice vs. Power
The story of the Ring of Gyges emerges during a philosophical debate between Socrates and his student, Glaucon. They ponder the reasons behind people’s just actions. Is it because it’s the right thing to do, or is it a societal convention enforced through punishment and reward?
The Tale of Gyges: From Shepherd to King
As part of the debate, Glaucon recounts the story of Gyges, a shepherd who stumbles upon a bronze horse containing a golden ring in a chasm opened by an earthquake. This ring, when twirled, grants Gyges invisibility. With this newfound power, Gyges embarks on a path of deceit and treachery, ultimately seizing the throne of Lydia.
The Power of Invisibility: A Tool for Injustice?
Glaucon uses this story to argue that people can benefit from acting unjustly, given the opportunity to do so without consequence. He categorizes all good things into three classes: those desired for their own sake, those desired for their value, and those desired for both. He places justice in the second category, suggesting that people act virtuously due to external influences, not intrinsic values.
Socrates’ Counterargument: The Tripartite Soul
Socrates, however, disagrees with Glaucon’s perspective. He believes justice belongs to the third category of good, offering both intrinsic and extrinsic benefits. He proposes that the human soul comprises three parts: reason, spirit, and appetite. Reason, guided by either spirit or appetite, leads an individual to truth and knowledge. A philosopher, led by reason and with their appetite kept in check by their spirit, is the most just and happiest, according to Socrates.
The Ring of Gyges: A Symbol of Moral Dilemma
The Ring of Gyges symbolizes the moral dilemma faced when given the opportunity to act without consequence. While Gyges may have gained power and wealth, Socrates implies that his soul would be in disharmony, enslaved to his base desires rather than guided by reason. This philosophical debate continues to inspire, posing the question: If the Ring of Gyges fell into your hands, what would you do?
Discussion Questions
- Do you believe that people are inherently good and act justly because it is the right thing to do, or do you think they only act justly due to external influences and consequences?
- How does the story of Gyges and the power of the ring challenge your understanding of morality and the choices people make?
- Do you agree with Glaucon’s argument that people would benefit from acting unjustly if they could do so without consequence? Why or why not?
- What are your thoughts on Socrates’ belief that justice offers both intrinsic and extrinsic benefits? How does this perspective align with your own values?
- How do you interpret the concept of the tripartite soul proposed by Socrates? Can you identify these three parts within yourself, and how do they influence your actions?
- What do you think the Ring of Gyges symbolizes in terms of moral dilemmas and the choices we make when given power and the opportunity to act without consequence?
- Do you believe that power inherently corrupts, or do you think it simply reveals the true nature of an individual? Can you provide examples to support your perspective?
- If you were in possession of the Ring of Gyges, what do you think you would do? How would your actions align with your personal values and beliefs about morality?
Lesson Vocabulary
power – the ability or capacity to do something or act in a particular way – The king’s power over his subjects was absolute.
morality – principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior – His strong sense of morality prevented him from cheating on the test.
invisibility – the state of not being able to be seen – The magician’s trick involved making objects disappear and reappear with invisibility.
philosophical debate – an intellectual discussion or argument about fundamental principles or beliefs – The philosophers engaged in a lively philosophical debate about the nature of reality.
justice – the quality of being fair and reasonable – The judge ensured that justice was served by giving a fair sentence to the criminal.
societal convention – an accepted and established way of behaving or doing things within a society – It is a societal convention to shake hands when greeting someone.
punishment – the infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution for an offense – The criminal received harsh punishment for his crimes.
reward – something given or received in return for one’s efforts or achievements – He received a monetary reward for winning the competition.
deceit – the action or practice of deceiving someone by concealing or misrepresenting the truth – She used deceit to manipulate others into doing what she wanted.
treachery – betrayal of trust; deceptive action or nature – The knight’s act of treachery led to the downfall of the kingdom.
Share This Lesson:
- Categories: Grade 10, Grade 9, Literature & Language, Philosophy, TED Ed, University, Video Lessons
- Keywords: deceit, invisibility, justice, morality, philosophical debate, power, punishment, reward, societal convention, treachery
