Getting every nation on Earth to agree on an environmental issue is challenging, but it has been accomplished before. The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer—commonly known as the Montreal Protocol—is the most successful step we’ve taken to protect our planet to date, but getting there wasn’t easy.
When you hear about the ozone layer, you might think of aerosol cans, but the story actually begins with air travel. In the early 1970s, international air travel increased significantly, prompting scientists to gather data on how airplanes were affecting Earth’s atmosphere. Ozone is a vital molecule composed of three oxygen atoms that exists mainly in the stratosphere, but it’s very rare: there are only about three molecules of ozone for every 10 million molecules of air. Still, those 0.3 parts per million of ozone play a critical role in absorbing biologically damaging UV-B sunlight.
At that time, ozone had already been studied, but Frank Sherwood Rowland and Mario Molina brought it into the spotlight. They suggested that chlorine atoms from refrigerators and air conditioning units might have a harmful effect on our atmosphere. Their hypothesis was proven correct. It turns out that chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) can float all the way up to the ozone layer. When they reach that altitude, the CFCs are broken down by ultraviolet light, releasing chlorine atoms that then react with ozone, breaking it down into oxygen molecules. Essentially, CFCs are detrimental to the ozone layer, and they were damaging our planet.
The study highlighted the role of man-made chemicals in this issue, leading to resistance from industry groups that produced these chemicals. Many argued that it was unnecessary to take action against these useful substances based on what they considered insufficient evidence. However, the scientific evidence continued to grow, and a report from the National Academy of Sciences published in 1976 solidified the link between CFCs and the depletion of the ozone layer.
Despite the mounting evidence, action was delayed until the problem became severe. In 1985, researchers discovered that the ozone layer over the South Pole had depleted by about 40 percent in just a decade. Even NASA had not noticed this depletion because their programs were set to ignore what they assumed were impossible ozone measurements.
Eventually, 28 nations, including most of the largest CFC producers, signed the Vienna Conventions, which established guidelines for negotiating international regulations on substances harmful to the ozone layer. However, this was not enough. About two years later, the Montreal Protocol was drafted. It aimed to reduce the production and consumption of substances harmful to atmospheric ozone and held signing nations accountable for gradually scaling back the use of nearly 100 chemicals. The protocol established a binding agreement to control these harmful substances, marking a significant step in environmental protection.
The treaty has been adjusted and amended multiple times since its inception to address unforeseen side effects. Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) were introduced as alternatives to CFCs in refrigeration and air conditioning. While HFCs do not harm the ozone layer, they are potent greenhouse gases that trap heat more effectively than carbon dioxide. Once this was recognized, a phase-out plan for HFCs was incorporated into the Montreal Protocol.
On September 16, 2009, the Vienna Conventions and the Montreal Protocol became the first universally ratified treaties in UN history. Now, 30 years later, the results of the Montreal Protocol are evident. The ozone hole over the South Pole is healing, and a new study has found a significant drop in greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. The prohibition of these chemicals has eliminated the equivalent of 170 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions annually, a level not anticipated in the original treaty. The team estimates that by 2025, the U.S. will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by the equivalent of 500 million tonnes of CO2 each year compared to 2005 levels.
The Montreal Protocol was successful due to the cooperation of all 197 signing nations. If history were to repeat itself, now would be an opportune time for global action. Global temperatures are still rising, and the Paris Agreement, designed to keep temperature increases below the 2-degree tipping point, is facing challenges from some signatories. However, the success of the Montreal Protocol demonstrates that collective action can lead to significant global change that benefits everyone.
Some countries are making more progress than others in the fight against climate change. We explored whether China is taking the right steps; you can check that out in our other video. Do you think it’s possible to undertake another climate agreement like the Montreal Protocol? Let us know in the comments, and be sure to like this video and subscribe for more content from Seeker.
Research the importance of the ozone layer and its role in protecting life on Earth. Create a presentation that explains how the ozone layer absorbs UV-B sunlight and why this is crucial for biological health. Share your findings with the class, highlighting the impact of ozone depletion.
Participate in a class debate about the historical use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). Divide into two groups: one supporting the industrial use of CFCs due to their benefits, and the other opposing their use due to environmental harm. Use scientific evidence from the article to support your arguments.
Create a detailed timeline that outlines the key events leading to the creation and implementation of the Montreal Protocol. Include important milestones such as the discovery of the ozone hole and the signing of the Vienna Conventions. Present your timeline to the class and discuss the significance of each event.
Engage in a role-playing activity where you represent different countries involved in the Montreal Protocol negotiations. Discuss the challenges and compromises faced by nations in reaching a global agreement. Reflect on how international cooperation can address environmental issues.
Analyze the environmental and economic impacts of the Montreal Protocol. Write a report that evaluates the protocol’s success in reducing ozone-depleting substances and its influence on greenhouse gas emissions. Consider how these lessons can be applied to current climate agreements.
Here’s a sanitized version of the YouTube transcript:
—
Getting every nation on Earth to agree on an environmental issue is challenging, but it has been accomplished before. The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer—commonly known as the Montreal Protocol—is the most successful step we’ve taken to protect our planet to date, but getting there wasn’t easy.
When you hear about the ozone layer, you might think of aerosol cans, but the story actually begins with air travel. In the early 1970s, international air travel increased significantly, prompting scientists to gather data on how airplanes were affecting Earth’s atmosphere. Ozone is a vital molecule composed of three oxygen atoms that exists mainly in the stratosphere, but it’s very rare: there are only about three molecules of ozone for every 10 million molecules of air. Still, those 0.3 parts per million of ozone play a critical role in absorbing biologically damaging UV-B sunlight.
At that time, ozone had already been studied, but Frank Sherwood Rowland and Mario Molina brought it into the spotlight. They suggested that chlorine atoms from refrigerators and air conditioning units might have a harmful effect on our atmosphere. Their hypothesis was proven correct. It turns out that chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) can float all the way up to the ozone layer. When they reach that altitude, the CFCs are broken down by ultraviolet light, releasing chlorine atoms that then react with ozone, breaking it down into oxygen molecules. Essentially, CFCs are detrimental to the ozone layer, and they were damaging our planet.
The study highlighted the role of man-made chemicals in this issue, leading to resistance from industry groups that produced these chemicals. Many argued that it was unnecessary to take action against these useful substances based on what they considered insufficient evidence. However, the scientific evidence continued to grow, and a report from the National Academy of Sciences published in 1976 solidified the link between CFCs and the depletion of the ozone layer.
Despite the mounting evidence, action was delayed until the problem became severe. In 1985, researchers discovered that the ozone layer over the South Pole had depleted by about 40 percent in just a decade. Even NASA had not noticed this depletion because their programs were set to ignore what they assumed were impossible ozone measurements.
Eventually, 28 nations, including most of the largest CFC producers, signed the Vienna Conventions, which established guidelines for negotiating international regulations on substances harmful to the ozone layer. However, this was not enough. About two years later, the Montreal Protocol was drafted. It aimed to reduce the production and consumption of substances harmful to atmospheric ozone and held signing nations accountable for gradually scaling back the use of nearly 100 chemicals. The protocol established a binding agreement to control these harmful substances, marking a significant step in environmental protection.
The treaty has been adjusted and amended multiple times since its inception to address unforeseen side effects. Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) were introduced as alternatives to CFCs in refrigeration and air conditioning. While HFCs do not harm the ozone layer, they are potent greenhouse gases that trap heat more effectively than carbon dioxide. Once this was recognized, a phase-out plan for HFCs was incorporated into the Montreal Protocol.
On September 16, 2009, the Vienna Conventions and the Montreal Protocol became the first universally ratified treaties in UN history. Now, 30 years later, the results of the Montreal Protocol are evident. The ozone hole over the South Pole is healing, and a new study has found a significant drop in greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. The prohibition of these chemicals has eliminated the equivalent of 170 million tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions annually, a level not anticipated in the original treaty. The team estimates that by 2025, the U.S. will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by the equivalent of 500 million tonnes of CO2 each year compared to 2005 levels.
The Montreal Protocol was successful due to the cooperation of all 197 signing nations. If history were to repeat itself, now would be an opportune time for global action. Global temperatures are still rising, and the Paris Agreement, designed to keep temperature increases below the 2-degree tipping point, is facing challenges from some signatories. However, the success of the Montreal Protocol demonstrates that collective action can lead to significant global change that benefits everyone.
Some countries are making more progress than others in the fight against climate change. We explored whether China is taking the right steps; you can check that out in our other video. Do you think it’s possible to undertake another climate agreement like the Montreal Protocol? Let us know in the comments, and be sure to like this video and subscribe for more content from Seeker.
—
This version removes informal language and maintains a professional tone while preserving the key points and information from the original transcript.
Montreal – A city in Canada where the Montreal Protocol, an international treaty to protect the ozone layer, was signed in 1987. – The Montreal Protocol is considered one of the most successful environmental agreements in history.
Protocol – An official procedure or system of rules governing affairs of state or diplomatic occasions, often used in environmental agreements to outline commitments and actions. – The protocol established strict guidelines for reducing the production of substances harmful to the ozone layer.
Ozone – A molecule composed of three oxygen atoms, found in the Earth’s stratosphere, that absorbs most of the sun’s harmful ultraviolet radiation. – Scientists have observed a significant recovery of the ozone layer due to international efforts to reduce harmful emissions.
Layer – A distinct sheet or thickness of material, often used to describe the stratospheric ozone layer that protects life on Earth from ultraviolet radiation. – The depletion of the ozone layer has been a major environmental concern since the late 20th century.
CFC – Chlorofluorocarbon, a class of compounds once commonly used in refrigeration and aerosols, known to deplete the ozone layer. – The use of CFCs has been largely phased out due to their damaging effects on the ozone layer.
Greenhouse – Relating to the greenhouse effect, a natural process where certain gases trap heat in the Earth’s atmosphere, contributing to global warming. – Greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane are major contributors to climate change.
Emissions – The act of releasing substances, especially gases, into the atmosphere, often from industrial processes and vehicles. – Reducing carbon emissions is crucial for mitigating the impacts of climate change.
Climate – The long-term pattern of weather conditions in a region, including temperature, precipitation, and wind, influenced by natural and human factors. – Scientists study climate patterns to predict future environmental changes and impacts.
Change – A transformation or modification, often used in the context of climate change to describe significant alterations in global weather patterns. – Climate change poses significant risks to ecosystems, economies, and communities worldwide.
Chemicals – Substances with a distinct molecular composition that are produced by or used in chemical processes, some of which can have harmful environmental effects. – The regulation of industrial chemicals is essential to prevent pollution and protect ecosystems.
