I’ve often pondered a significant question: “What is the best way to teach people about science?” This topic frequently occupies my thoughts, and I’d like to share my journey and insights with you.
My academic background spans various scientific disciplines, including psychology, biology, and neurobiology, which I thoroughly enjoyed. I was fortunate to work with Australia’s national science agency, where I traveled to schools to introduce students to different scientific fields. During this time, I discovered research suggesting that children form their opinions about science—either positive or negative—by the age of seven. This revelation inspired me to show young children the wonders of science. I conducted workshops on remote tropical islands, traveled to Papua New Guinea, and delivered astronomy talks in central Australia.
Research indicates that problem-solving approaches are generally more effective in education than traditional lectures and rote memorization. Since my classes were hands-on, this finding was encouraging. Then, I discovered YouTube. The idea of reaching millions with a five-minute video intrigued me, compared to engaging only a few hundred students weekly. However, I questioned whether online education could be as effective as traditional, in-person teaching. I pondered this for a couple of years, also considering whether I wanted to put my face on the internet. After some procrastination, I completed a master’s degree in science communication and decided to take action. Thus, BrainCraft was born.
Over the past two years, I have honed my skills as a writer, animator, and editor. I experimented with interactive elements to return to that problem-solving approach and created numerous videos to gauge audience preferences. This led me to reflect on the question: “What is the best way to teach people about science?”
In the world of educational videos, there exists a spectrum of “edutainment.” On one end, you have content inspired by textbooks, such as Crash Course, while on the other end, you have more cinematic presentations, like Vsauce3. I sought to determine whether one approach is more effective than the other. I consulted Will, my research supervisor from my master’s program, who provided valuable insights. He noted that both approaches serve different purposes: storytelling and entertainment capture attention and convey the importance of the subject, while traditional educational methods have their own place.
I decided to experiment with a more entertainment-focused approach while maintaining high quality. However, I realized that this could be challenging to accomplish alone. This is when the YouTube Space offered assistance, providing me with a crew to help bring my ideas to fruition.
I aimed to create a visually appealing animation about the work of a notable scientist, Elizabeth Blackburn. I interviewed her and then collaborated with my team to animate the content over several weeks. I also planned a more cinematic project, intending to explore memory and forgetting through a four-room set at the YouTube Space, inspired by the film Birdman. This marked my first experience directing.
After nearly three months of work on the scripts, I completed my experiments. However, I returned to the question: “What is the best way to teach people about science?”
Ultimately, I found that there is no singular answer to this question. Different teaching methods offer various benefits and experiences for diverse audiences, and there is no perfect formula. Throughout the process of creating these videos, I realized that if one ceases to question and critically evaluate their work, they will hinder their own learning and improvement. This mirrors the scientific process, which is deeply connected to real-life experiences. For me, experimenting with different formats was invaluable in pushing the boundaries of my creativity. Regardless of age, one should never stop experimenting.
Engage in a hands-on science workshop where you will explore various scientific concepts through experiments and problem-solving activities. This approach mirrors the effective teaching methods discussed in the article, emphasizing active participation over passive learning.
Create a short educational video on a scientific topic of your choice. This activity will help you understand the process of science communication, similar to the journey of BrainCraft. Focus on balancing educational content with engaging storytelling.
Analyze different educational videos, such as those from Crash Course and Vsauce3. Compare their approaches and effectiveness in conveying scientific concepts. This will help you appreciate the spectrum of edutainment and its impact on learning.
Work in teams to create an animated presentation about a notable scientist. This activity will allow you to experiment with visual storytelling and animation, similar to the projects described in the article. Focus on making the content both informative and visually appealing.
Participate in a group discussion reflecting on the question: “What is the best way to teach people about science?” Share your insights and experiences from the activities, and consider how different methods can be applied to various audiences.
Here’s a sanitized version of the transcript, removing any informal language and ensuring clarity while maintaining the original message:
—
There is a question I have been contemplating for a considerable time: “What is the best way to teach people about science?” This is a topic I think about frequently, and I would like to share my thought process with you.
To begin, I studied various fields of science, including psychology, biology, and neurobiology, which I found quite enjoyable. I secured a position with Australia’s national science agency, where I traveled to schools to teach students about different areas of science. During this time, I encountered research indicating that children form opinions about science—either positive or negative—by the age of seven. This finding surprised me and motivated me to demonstrate to young children how fascinating science can be. I conducted workshops for children in remote tropical islands, traveled to Papua New Guinea, and even delivered astronomy talks in central Australia.
Further research has shown that problem-solving approaches are generally more effective in education than traditional lectures and memorization. Since most of my classes were hands-on, I felt encouraged by this. Then, I discovered YouTube. I was intrigued by the potential of a five-minute video to reach millions of viewers, while I could only engage with a few hundred students each week. However, I began to question whether online education is as effective as traditional, in-person education and whether one method has a greater impact than the other. I pondered this for a couple of years, also considering whether I wanted to put my face on the internet. After some procrastination, I completed a master’s degree in science communication and ultimately decided it was time to take action. Thus, BrainCraft was born.
Over the past two years, I have focused on improving my skills as a writer, animator, and editor. I experimented with interactive elements to return to that problem-solving approach and created numerous videos to gauge audience preferences. This led me to reflect on the question: “What is the best way to teach people about science?”
In the realm of educational videos, there exists a spectrum of “edutainment.” On one end, you have content inspired by textbooks, such as Crash Course, while on the other end, you have more cinematic presentations, like Vsauce3. I sought to determine whether one approach is more effective than the other. I consulted Will, my research supervisor from my master’s program, who provided valuable insights. He noted that both approaches serve different purposes: storytelling and entertainment capture attention and convey the importance of the subject, while traditional educational methods have their own place.
I decided to experiment with a more entertainment-focused approach while maintaining high quality. However, I realized that this could be challenging to accomplish alone. This is when the YouTube Space offered assistance, providing me with a crew to help bring my ideas to fruition.
I aimed to create a visually appealing animation about the work of a notable scientist, Elizabeth Blackburn. I interviewed her and then collaborated with my team to animate the content over several weeks. I also planned a more cinematic project, intending to explore memory and forgetting through a four-room set at the YouTube Space, inspired by the film Birdman. This marked my first experience directing.
After nearly three months of work on the scripts, I completed my experiments. However, I returned to the question: “What is the best way to teach people about science?”
Ultimately, I found that there is no singular answer to this question. Different teaching methods offer various benefits and experiences for diverse audiences, and there is no perfect formula. Throughout the process of creating these videos, I realized that if one ceases to question and critically evaluate their work, they will hinder their own learning and improvement. This mirrors the scientific process, which is deeply connected to real-life experiences. For me, experimenting with different formats was invaluable in pushing the boundaries of my creativity. Regardless of age, one should never stop experimenting.
—
This version maintains the essence of the original transcript while ensuring clarity and professionalism.
Science – The systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment. – Science has revolutionized our understanding of the universe, from the smallest particles to the vastness of space.
Education – The process of receiving or giving systematic instruction, especially at a school or university. – Education is a powerful tool that equips individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary to navigate and contribute to society.
Teaching – The act or profession of instructing or training others, especially in a school or university setting. – Effective teaching requires a deep understanding of the subject matter and the ability to engage students in meaningful learning experiences.
Methods – Systematic procedures or techniques used to accomplish a specific task or study a particular subject. – In scientific research, methods must be carefully designed to ensure accurate and reliable results.
Research – The systematic investigation into and study of materials and sources in order to establish facts and reach new conclusions. – Research in the field of renewable energy is crucial for developing sustainable solutions to global energy challenges.
Learning – The acquisition of knowledge or skills through study, experience, or teaching. – Learning is a lifelong process that extends beyond formal education and continues through personal and professional experiences.
Creativity – The use of imagination or original ideas to create something; inventiveness. – Creativity in scientific research can lead to innovative solutions and breakthroughs that address complex problems.
Communication – The imparting or exchanging of information or news, especially in a clear and effective manner. – Effective communication is essential for scientists to share their findings with the broader community and foster collaboration.
Experiments – Scientific procedures undertaken to test a hypothesis, demonstrate a known fact, or discover new information. – Carefully controlled experiments are fundamental to validating scientific theories and advancing knowledge.
Audience – The assembled spectators or listeners at a public event, such as a lecture or conference, or the intended readership for a piece of writing. – Understanding the audience is crucial for educators to tailor their teaching strategies and effectively convey complex concepts.
