Have you ever wondered if nature is secretly a math genius? Everywhere you look, from beehives to rocks, you can spot patterns and shapes. One shape that pops up a lot is the hexagon, which has six sides. But why does nature seem to love the number six? Let’s dive into this mystery with some help from bubbles and a cool mathematician named Kelsey from Infinite Series!
First, let’s talk about bubbles. A bubble is just a pocket of gas wrapped in a thin layer of liquid. You can see them in champagne or as soap bubbles. But why do they have a shape at all? It’s all about stability. Molecules in a liquid are more stable when they’re inside, away from the edges. This makes liquids form shapes with the smallest surface area possible. In space, water turns into round blobs because of this attraction. On Earth, soap bubbles become round because the pull of surface tension balances with the air pressure inside. It’s all about physics!
Mathematics helps us understand why bubbles are round. If you want to enclose the most volume with the least surface area, a sphere is the best shape. Even if you squish a bubble, it will try to return to this minimal surface shape. This idea is so useful that a German architect named Frei Otto used soap films to design efficient roofs!
Now, what happens when you pack bubbles together? A single bubble is a sphere, but when you pack them in a layer, they look like circles. If you want to cover a surface with equal-sized shapes without leaving gaps, you have three choices: triangles, squares, or hexagons. Which one is the best?
Let’s test it with bubbles. When two bubbles meet, they form a flat line. With three, they meet at 120-degree angles. Add a fourth, and instead of forming a square, they rearrange into hexagons. Hexagons are the most efficient shape because they use the least perimeter for a given area. This means more filling with fewer edges!
In the 19th century, a scientist named Joseph Plateau discovered that 120-degree junctions are the most stable. This is why bubble clusters form hexagonal patterns. It’s not just about minimizing edges; it’s also about balance and stability.
So, why do we see hexagons in nature? Take basalt columns like the Giant’s Causeway. As lava cools, it contracts, forming cracks that meet at 120 degrees, just like bubbles. Insect eyes also use hexagons to maximize light-sensing area while minimizing cell material. Even honeybees use hexagons for their hives. They start with round wax cells, but as the wax warms, it forms stable hexagonal shapes, just like bubbles!
So, is nature a mathematician? Some scientists think nature loves efficiency and seeks the lowest energy solutions. Others believe nature follows mathematical rules. Either way, nature uses simple rules to create beautiful and efficient solutions. Stay curious and keep exploring!
We’ve seen how nature finds the best solutions in three dimensions, but what if we think bigger? What would a honeycomb look like for a four-dimensional bee? Join us at Infinite Series to explore this fascinating math adventure!
Gather some soap and water to create your own bubbles. Observe how they form and interact with each other. Try to notice the shapes they make when they cluster together. Discuss why these shapes might be the most efficient and how they relate to the concepts of surface tension and minimal surface area.
Go on a nature walk or explore your surroundings to find examples of hexagons in nature. Look for honeycombs, basalt columns, or even patterns in leaves. Take pictures or draw what you find, and discuss why hexagons might be a preferred shape in these natural structures.
Using materials like straws, toothpicks, or sticks, try to build a stable hexagonal structure. Experiment with different shapes and see which ones are the most stable. Discuss how this relates to the stability of hexagons in nature and why they might be used in structures like beehives.
Create a piece of art using hexagonal patterns. You can draw, paint, or use digital tools to make your design. Think about how hexagons fit together without gaps and how this efficiency is reflected in nature. Share your artwork with the class and explain your design choices.
Watch videos or read about how soap films can be used to solve complex mathematical problems, like those tackled by architect Frei Otto. Discuss how these principles can be applied to real-world problems and design challenges. Consider how mathematics and nature can inspire innovative solutions.
Sure! Here’s a sanitized version of the transcript:
—
[MUSIC] Is nature a mathematician? Patterns and geometry are everywhere, but nature seems to have a particular affinity for the number 6. Beehives, rocks, marine skeletons, insect eyes—these patterns appear frequently. It could be a mathematical coincidence, or perhaps there’s a deeper reason why nature arrives at this geometry. We’re going to explore this… with some bubbles and assistance from our favorite mathematician, Kelsey from Infinite Series. Happy to help!
[OPEN] A bubble is simply a volume of gas surrounded by liquid. It can be surrounded by a lot of liquid, like in champagne, or just a thin layer, like in soap bubbles. So why do these bubbles have any shape at all? Liquid molecules are more stable when they are wrapped up inside, where attraction is balanced, than they are at the edge. This causes liquids to adopt shapes with the least surface area. In zero gravity, this attraction pulls water into round blobs, just like droplets on leaves or a spider’s web. Inside thin soap films, the attraction between soap molecules shrinks the bubble until the pull of surface tension is balanced by the air pressure pushing out. It’s physics!
Physics is fascinating, but mathematics is truly the universal language. Bubbles are round because if you want to enclose the maximum volume with the least surface area, a sphere is the most efficient shape. What’s interesting is that if we deform that bubble, the pull of surface tension always evens back out to the minimal surface shape. This even works when soap films are stretched between complex boundaries; they always cover an area using the least amount of material. That’s why German architect Frei Otto used soap films to model ideal roof shapes for his unique constructions.
Now let’s see what happens when we start to pack bubbles together. A sphere is a three-dimensional shape, but when we pack bubbles in a single layer, we really only need to look at the cross-section: a circle. Rigid circles of equal diameter can cover, at most, 90% of the area on a plane, but luckily bubbles aren’t rigid. Let’s pretend for a moment these bubbles could choose any shape they wanted. If we want to tile a plane with cells of equal size and no wasted area, we only have three regular polygons to choose from: triangles, squares, or hexagons. So which is best?
We can test this with actual bubbles. Two equal-sized bubbles create a flat intersection. With three, we get walls meeting at 120 degrees. But when we add a fourth, instead of a square intersection, the bubbles will always rearrange themselves so their intersections are at 120 degrees, the same angle that defines a hexagon. If the goal is to minimize the perimeter for a given area, it turns out that hexagonal packing is more efficient than triangles and squares. In other words, it allows for more filling with fewer edges.
In the late 19th century, Belgian physicist Joseph Plateau calculated that junctions of 120 degrees are also the most mechanically stable arrangement, where the forces on the films are all in balance. That’s why bubble rafts form hexagonal patterns. Not only does it minimize the perimeter, but the pull of surface tension in each direction is also most mechanically stable.
So let’s review: The air inside a bubble wants to fill the most area possible, but there’s a force, surface tension, that wants to minimize the perimeter. When bubbles join up, the best balance of fewer edges and mechanical stability is hexagonal packing. Is this enough to explain some of the six-sided patterns we see in nature? Basalt columns like Giant’s Causeway, Devil’s Postpile, and the Plains of Catan form from slowly cooling lava. Cooling pulls the rock to fill less space, just like surface tension pulls on a soap film. Cracks form to release tension and reach mechanical stability, and more energy is released per crack if they meet at 120 degrees. This is quite similar to the behavior of bubbles.
The forces are different, but they use similar mathematics to solve a similar problem. What about the facets of an insect’s eye? Here, instead of a physical force, evolution is the driving factor. Maximum light-sensing area is beneficial for the insect, but so is minimizing the amount of cell material around the edges. Just like the bubbles, the best shapes are hexagons.
What’s even more interesting is that if you look down at the bottom of each facet, there’s a cluster of four cone cells, packed just like bubbles are. Bubbles can even help explain honeycomb. It would be nice to imagine number-crunching bees experimenting with triangles and squares and realizing hexagons are the most efficient balance of wax to area, but with a brain the size of a poppy seed? They’re not mathematicians. It turns out honeybees initially create round wax cells. As the wax is softened by heat from busy bees, it’s pulled by surface tension into stable hexagonal shapes, just like our bubbles. You can even recreate this with a bundle of plastic straws and a little heat.
So is nature a mathematician? Some scientists might say nature loves efficiency, or that nature seeks out the lowest energy. Others might argue that nature follows the rules of mathematics. However you look at it, nature definitely has a way of using simple rules to create elegant solutions. Stay curious!
So that’s how nature arrives at the optimal solution for three-dimensional bees, but you know mathematicians love to take things to the next level. What would the honeycomb look like for a four-dimensional bee? Follow me over to Infinite Series, and Joe and I will explore the math.
—
This version maintains the essence of the original transcript while removing any unnecessary or informal language.
Nature – The basic or inherent features of something, especially when seen as characteristic of it. – In mathematics, the nature of a number can determine whether it is prime or composite.
Mathematics – The abstract science of number, quantity, and space, either as abstract concepts or as applied to other disciplines such as physics and engineering. – Mathematics helps us understand patterns and relationships in the world around us.
Bubbles – Spherical pockets of gas within a liquid or solid, often used to demonstrate principles of surface tension in physics. – When you blow bubbles in a liquid, they tend to form spheres because this shape has the least surface area for a given volume.
Hexagon – A six-sided polygon often found in natural and man-made structures due to its efficient tiling properties. – The hexagon is a common shape in nature, as seen in the honeycomb structure of a beehive.
Surface – The outermost layer or boundary of an object or material. – The surface area of a sphere can be calculated using the formula 4πr², where r is the radius.
Volume – The amount of space that a substance or object occupies, or that is enclosed within a container. – To find the volume of a cube, you multiply the length of one side by itself three times.
Stability – The state of being steady and not changing or being disturbed easily. – In physics, the stability of a structure can be analyzed by examining the forces acting upon it.
Shapes – The external form or appearance characteristic of someone or something; the outline of an area or figure. – Different shapes have different properties, such as the number of sides or angles.
Physics – The branch of science concerned with the nature and properties of matter and energy. – Physics helps us understand how forces like gravity and magnetism work.
Efficiency – The ability to accomplish a task with the least waste of time and effort. – In physics, efficiency is often calculated as the ratio of useful energy output to total energy input.
