Imagine it’s the middle of the night, and suddenly there’s a loud knock on your door. Before you know it, you’re being dragged out of bed and thrown into a cold, dark prison cell. Why? Because one of your neighbors saw your collection of potted herbs and accused you of being a witch. Now, you’re facing torture, impossible tests, and made-up evidence. Your life is on the line. Between the 15th and 18th centuries, around 100,000 people were accused of witchcraft in Europe and America. Let’s explore if you could survive a witch hunt.
Throughout history, people have often pointed fingers at those who were different. Witch trials were a prime example of this. Women were more likely to be accused, with about 80% of the victims being female. However, men weren’t completely safe either. In places like Iceland, many men were accused. Typically, those from lower social classes, like the wives or widows of poor farmers, were targeted. In the Salem witch trials, those who didn’t fit into the strict Puritan lifestyle were often accused. Even wearing torn clothes, like Bridget Bishop, could lead to accusations of witchcraft.
In many places, just having a few people gossip about you was enough to get you arrested. In Salem, it only took one trusted community member to accuse you. Once accused, you could face torture. The Pope even declared witchcraft a criminal offense, allowing torture to be used on the accused. Methods included sleep deprivation, sitting on hot stools, or being crushed under stones. These tactics were meant to force confessions or make people name others as witches. Confessions obtained this way were often considered reliable, even though they were made under extreme duress.
Confessing might seem like a way to avoid execution, but it wasn’t always that simple. In Europe, if you could endure the torture without confessing, you might be released. However, this was incredibly difficult. In Salem, those who confessed avoided execution, while those who didn’t were often hanged. Confessing meant being shunned by society and possibly facing eternal damnation, a fate worse than death for some.
Your legal options were limited. An alibi was useless because it was believed that witchcraft could happen without you being present. In some places, you could have a lawyer, but often you had to defend yourself. Proving you weren’t a witch was nearly impossible, as the evidence was often based on superstition. For example, if a woman didn’t cry during her trial, she was considered a witch.
One test was the prayer test, where accused witches had to recite a Bible verse perfectly. Many couldn’t do this, especially if they were illiterate. Even if you passed, it didn’t guarantee survival. George Burrows recited his prayer perfectly but was executed anyway. Another test involved making a “witch cake” with rye meal, urine, and ashes, which was fed to a dog. If the dog acted strangely, it supposedly meant a witch was nearby.
It was believed that witches had a mark on their bodies. Accused witches were examined for unusual marks, which were thought to be insensitive to pain. Witch hunters used needles to test these marks. Some people tried to remove these marks, but this often made things worse.
In this test, the accused were thrown into water. If they sank, they were innocent; if they floated, they were guilty. This was based on the belief that water would reject witches. Many drowned during this test. Grace Sherwood, a woman from Virginia, floated and was deemed guilty.
In this test, the accused would touch someone supposedly bewitched. If the person’s symptoms stopped, the accused was considered guilty. Even when the test was proven unreliable, like in the case of Rose Cullender and Amy Denny, they were still executed.
If you couldn’t endure the torture, recite the Bible perfectly, or pass the tests, your best option might be to run away. Some people chose to flee at the first sign of trouble, leaving everything behind. Would you run for the hills, or would you try to survive the trials? Let us know your thoughts!
Imagine you are living in the 17th century and have been accused of witchcraft. Create a short skit or role-play with your classmates where you simulate a witch trial. Assign roles such as the accused, the accuser, the judge, and witnesses. Discuss how each character might feel and what strategies they might use to survive the trial.
Choose a real witch trial from history, such as the Salem witch trials or the Pendle witch trials. Research the events, key figures, and outcomes. Present your findings to the class, highlighting the social and political factors that contributed to the trial and its impact on the community.
Divide into two groups and hold a debate on whether witch trials were justified based on the beliefs and knowledge of the time. One group will argue in favor of the trials, while the other will argue against them. Use historical evidence and logical reasoning to support your arguments.
Work in pairs to create a “Survival Guide” for someone accused of witchcraft. Include tips on how to avoid suspicion, what to do if accused, and strategies for surviving the trials and tests. Use historical context to make your guide realistic and informative.
Write a short essay analyzing how superstition influenced the witch trials. Consider how fear and lack of scientific understanding contributed to the accusations and tests. Discuss how these superstitions were used to control or manipulate communities and individuals.
Here’s a sanitized version of the provided YouTube transcript:
—
It’s the middle of the night when you hear a banging on your door. Suddenly, you’re being dragged out of bed and shoved into a dark, cold prison cell. The reason? One of your neighbors noticed your assortment of potted herbs and accused you of witchcraft. You now face torture, impossible tests, and imaginary evidence. The stakes? Your life. Between the 15th and 18th centuries, an estimated 100,000 people were prosecuted for witchcraft across Europe and America. Today on Nutty History, follow along to determine if you have what it takes to survive the trials of a witch hunt. But first, we have to say the magic words: please like this video and subscribe to our channel, and let us know what hair-raising history you’d like to hear about next.
High school never ends. It’s a darker fact of human nature that people point fingers at those who are different from the norm. Witch trials were no exception, and not all people were accused evenly. If you were a woman, your chances of being accused were much higher. In the European witch trials, an estimated 50,000 people were burned at the stake, with 80 percent of the victims being women. That didn’t necessarily make you safe as a man, though; in certain areas like Iceland, a significant percentage of the accused were men. Lower-ranking members of society were more often accused. Across Europe, a wife or widow of a poor farmer was the usual suspect, especially if they were known to be quarrelsome or aggressive. Similarly, the victims of the Salem witch trials were generally outliers of society who didn’t fit in or abide by the strict Puritan lifestyle. It didn’t take much to be considered a deviant to the Puritans. Bridget Bishop was tried and convicted of witchcraft in one day because she wore black clothing and her coat was torn in a suspicious manner. Apparently, not taking care of your clothes equated to devil worship. Still, no one was truly immune from the witch hunts; even nobility and wealthy members of society were convicted if they ruffled the wrong person’s feathers.
In most areas with witch trials, having credible accusers was enough evidence to arrest you. In Switzerland, for instance, public gossip between three or four neighbors justified an arrest. In Salem, it just took one trusted community member, and you’d find yourself incarcerated. The next step was often torture. The Pope even declared witchcraft a criminal offense, which essentially said that torture laws did not apply to accused witches. As an incarcerated witch, you might face up to 40 hours of sleep deprivation, sulfur thrown on your feet, sitting on burning hot stools, or suffocating beneath a pile of stones. These disturbing tactics were used to elicit confessions or to strongly encourage people to name co-conspirators of their alleged sorcery. Confessions under torture were often deemed trustworthy, despite skepticism about these methods at the time. Those who expressed dissent often found themselves on the wrong side of a pointed finger, so keeping your head down and your mouth shut was ultimately much less risky than speaking out.
Confessing might seem like an easy way to avoid execution; after all, aren’t you handing them their best evidence? Surprisingly, that wasn’t always the case in Europe. If you could withstand the torture long enough without confessing, you had a better chance of being released, but at what cost? One woman in Germany endured 56 torture sessions before her charges were dropped; another in Austria died after spending 11 days on a torture stool without confessing. Survival here wasn’t so cut and dry. In Salem, however, every one of the accused that confessed avoided trial and execution, while all 19 who were executed refused to confess. It sounds like a simple choice for survival, but to a Puritan, confessing to witchcraft meant permanently ostracizing yourself from society and possibly damning yourself to hell—a fate worse than death for some.
Your legal options were limited, to say the least. For starters, an alibi was useless because it was thought witchcraft could occur without the person actually being at the scene. While some areas allowed the accused to have a defense lawyer, more often they were left to fend for themselves. Their only option was to question witnesses, which didn’t always accomplish much as the accused often didn’t know what to ask and were confronting unprovable evidence. How exactly does one go about proving they aren’t possessed by the devil? The behavior of the alleged victims in court could also factor into the trial’s outcome. In the popular 1486 book “Malleus Maleficarum,” it was stated that any woman who doesn’t cry during her trial is definitely a witch.
One so-called foolproof test for witchcraft was called the prayer test. Accused witches would be forced to recite a scripture from the Bible from memory without making any mistakes or slip-ups. Many of the accused were illiterate or unaccustomed to public speaking, so perfect speech didn’t come easily. Of course, like most witch tests, passing didn’t necessarily ensure your survival. An accused sorcerer, George Burrows, perfectly recited his assigned prayer from the gallows just before he was set to be hanged. This was deemed a devil’s trick, and Burrows was executed anyway.
In an unusual twist, some people believed in the use of witch cakes. Ingredients of a witch cake included rye meal, urine from the afflicted parties, and ashes. This cake was then fed to a dog, as dogs were seen to have a close association with the devil. If witches were near, the dog would supposedly go under a spell and turn aggressive before sniffing out the witch herself. In Salem, a slave woman named Tituba was instructed to help prepare such a cake. Shockingly, it didn’t work, and her knowledge of recipes was later used against her in her own witchcraft trial.
It was believed that witches received a bodily mark to seal their deal with the devil. As an accused witch, you were often stripped and examined for any abnormal skin blemishes. The devil’s mark could supposedly change size and shape over time. The mark was also supposed to be insensitive to pain, which led to the creation of witch prickers. This involved stabbing the spot with needles; if it didn’t bleed, it was deemed a witch’s mark. Professional witch hunters moved from town to town in Europe, earning money to track down and unmask witches. They often carried a trick needle with a sharp end and a blunt end, flipping sides when they needed to show that the mark didn’t bleed. Some people tried to avoid diagnosis of the devil’s mark by attempting to burn or cut off any skin markings, but this often resulted in worse markings than before.
A popular test in Europe, trial by water, involved binding the accused or sewing them into a sack and throwing them into a nearby lake. From there, it was truly sink or swim. If the person sank, they were not a witch; if they floated, they were guilty. Since witches were seen to have spurned their baptism, the water would reject their body and prevent them from submerging. Some of the accused sank to the bottom and drowned anyway. A Virginian woman, Grace Sherwood, underwent a trial by water only to find herself inconveniently buoyant and floating on the surface.
In the touch test, those suffering from a spell would be touched by the accused witch. If their fits subsided, it meant the person who touched them was the one who initially cast the spell. Two English women, Rose Cullender and Amy Denny, underwent the touch test at trial. The supposedly bewitched parties were two young girls who had fits that left their fists so tightly clenched that not even a grown man could pry them apart. When Cullender and Denny touched the children, their fists miraculously loosened. To prove the legitimacy of this test, judges had the girls blindfolded and touched by other people in the court, but they didn’t pass the control test and still unclenched their fists. Nevertheless, Cullender and Denny were hanged as witches anyway.
Here’s why flying off on a broomstick would come in handy: if you’re not convinced that you’d be able to endure lengthy torture, perfectly recite the Bible, safely remove all of your moles and birthmarks, sink to the bottom of any body of water, or avoid curing an imaginary curse, your best option is to run for your life. After witnessing the horrors of the witch trials, some people chose to flee as soon as the accusations started. This was a more feasible option for transient people, as it meant leaving behind all of your possessions, land, and family. So, would you run for the hills at the first whiff of a nosy neighbor, or perhaps you’d prefer to stick it out because you intimidate dogs and have blemish-free skin? Let us know in the comments, and be sure to subscribe to follow along for more historical insights.
—
This version removes any inappropriate language and maintains a respectful tone while preserving the essence of the original content.
Witchcraft – The practice of magical skills, spells, and abilities, often associated with historical events where individuals were accused of using such powers for harmful purposes. – In the late 1600s, many people in Salem were accused of witchcraft, leading to a series of infamous trials.
Trials – Formal examinations of evidence in a court, typically to decide guilt in a case of criminal or civil proceedings. – The Salem witch trials were a series of hearings and prosecutions of people accused of witchcraft in colonial Massachusetts.
Accusations – Claims or charges that someone has done something illegal or wrong, often without proof. – During the witch hunts, accusations were often based on fear and superstition rather than concrete evidence.
Evidence – Information or signs indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid, especially in a legal context. – The lack of credible evidence in the witch trials led to many innocent people being unjustly punished.
Confession – A formal statement admitting that one is guilty of a crime, often obtained under duress in historical contexts. – Some accused witches gave false confessions after being subjected to intense pressure and fear of torture.
Survival – The state of continuing to live or exist, often despite difficult conditions or circumstances. – The survival of those accused of witchcraft often depended on their ability to prove their innocence or escape persecution.
Torture – The act of inflicting severe pain on someone as a punishment or to force them to say or do something. – Torture was sometimes used during witch trials to extract confessions from the accused.
Superstition – An irrational belief arising from ignorance or fear, often involving the supernatural. – Superstition played a significant role in the witch hunts, as people feared the unknown and attributed misfortunes to witchcraft.
Tests – Procedures intended to establish the quality, performance, or reliability of something, especially before it is taken into widespread use. – The so-called “witch tests” were often unfair and based on superstition rather than scientific reasoning.
History – The study of past events, particularly in human affairs, often focusing on how these events shape the present and future. – Understanding the history of the witch trials helps us learn about the dangers of mass hysteria and injustice.
